Alex Guadarrama et al v. Sasan Chadorbaff
Alex Guadarrama and Christian Guadarrama |
Sasan Chadorbaff and Does |
8:2017cv00645 |
April 10, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O. Carter |
John D. Early |
Truth in Lending |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 FINAL JUDGMENT ON MINUTE ORDER DATED APRIL 30, 2018 42 AND MINUTE ORDER DATED JUNE 25, 2018 51 by Judge David O. Carter. In favor of Plaintiffs Alex Guadarrama and Christian Guadarrama and against Defendant Sasan Chadorbaff, individually and S asan Chadorbaff dba as Western Motors as follows: (a) Damages, in the amount of $11,303.00 (b) Attorneys fees for Aiden Butler, Esq. $ 1,261.80 (c) Litigation Costs for Lisa G. Salisbury, Esq. $ 645.49 (d) Attorneys Fees for Lisa G. Salisbury, Esq. $16,474.50 TOTAL $29,684.79. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb) |
Filing 36 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordi ngly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than March 6, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (Refer to Order for details.) (es) |
Filing 28 MINUTES OF (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. The Court hereby ORDERS plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than November 9, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiffs, the Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: (see order.) (es) |
Filing 10 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as refl ected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than July 12, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. See document for further information. (dv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.