Ivin Mood v. County of Orange et al
| Ivin Mood |
| County of Orange and D. Lopes |
| 8:2017cv00762 |
| April 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Stephen V. Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, in favor of County of Orange against Ivin Mood. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE and against Plaintiff IVIN MOOD, that Plaintiff IVIN MOOD take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits with prejudice, and that Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE is the prevailing party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and is entitled to recover its costs incurred in this action in accordance with said Rule and Local Rules of this Court. This Judgment may be amended to include any costs and other litigation expenses awarded to Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE by the Court. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson for for Summary Judgment 52 , Report and Recommendation (Final) 71 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (see document for details) (hr)
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE AS UNTIMELY by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, (dts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
