Samantha De Silva v. Specialized Loan Service, Inc.
||Samantha De Silva
||Specialized Loan Service, Inc. and Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
||June 15, 2017
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Southern Division - Santa Ana Office
||Jay C. Gandhi
||James V. Selna
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 21, 2017
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS Order to Show Cause by Judge James V. Selna: Attorney McMahon shall reply in writing to this Order to Show cause within ten days and shall personally appear on July 5, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Further, the Ryan Law Firm shall show cause in writing within ten days why it should not be held jointly responsible pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 11(c)(1). See document for further information. (dv)
|June 15, 2017
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING ACTION by Judge James V. Selna: The Court has reviewed the notice of removal filed by Specialized LoanService (Specialized) on May 19, 2017. (Docket No. 1.) The notice purports to remove a $304 small cl aims dispute from the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange. The Court notes that the attempted at removal here hardly comports with the goal of Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to provide for a just, speed y, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding. (Fed. R. Civ. R.1.) Removal denied plaintiff her June 6, 2017 hearing on her $304 claim. Specializeds filing fee was more than the amount of the dispute. *Refer to Order for details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (es)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?