Michael Korman v. Experian Information Solutions Inc. et al
| Michael Korman |
| Does, Experian Information Solutions Inc., Progressive Management Services, R.M. Galicia, Inc. dba Progressive Management Systems and USCB America |
| 8:2018cv00024 |
| January 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E. Scott |
| Andrew J. Guilford |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)(A)(II) by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, Having considered the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. Each party to bear theirown costs and expenses. 47 (es)
|
|
Filing
46
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT AND REMOVING CASE FROM ACTIVE 45 CASELOAD by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. On January 7, 2019, counsel for plaintiff filed a "Notice of Settlement as to the Entire Cas e". The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case stayed pending final settlement. Counsel shall file settlement documents and/or a dismissal with this Court by March 8, 2019. (See order for further details) Case Terminated. Made JS-6. Case stayed. (es)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott 36 . (jdo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
