Richard Mager v. Fedex Express et al
Plaintiff: Richard Mager
Defendant: Fedex Express, FedEx Corporation, Federal Express, Federal Express Corporation and Does 1-50 inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Hiro Aragaki
Case Number: 8:2018cv01463
Filed: August 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the matter of Richard Mager v. FedEx Express, et al., filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, bearing Case Number 8:18-cv-01463-JLS-KES is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety #24 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
September 19, 2019 Filing 24 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Case Settled filed by Plaintiff Richard Mager. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to dismiss)(McMillan, Heather)
July 3, 2019 Filing 23 MEDIATION REPORT Filed by Plaintiff Richard Mager: Mediation held on June 27, 2019. The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.Counsel: Please evaluate the effectiveness of the ADR Program by completing a survey on your mediation experience. To access the survey, click on the following link: #MediationParticipantSurvey(McMillan, Heather)
November 1, 2018 Filing 22 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Hiro Aragaki has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (mb)
October 31, 2018 Filing 21 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties request that the ADR Program assign a Panel Mediator from the following area of law: Employment Law. Filed by Plaintiff Richard Mager(McMillan, Heather)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No. 2 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Case is ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than October 11, 2019. (tg)
October 8, 2018 Filing 19 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 2 filed. Parties request to appear before a neutral selected from the court's Mediation Panel for mediation. Filed by Plaintiff Richard Mager(McMillan, Heather)
October 8, 2018 Filing 18 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant FedEx Corporation, Fedex Express filed by Plaintiff Richard Mager.(McMillan, Heather)
October 1, 2018 Filing 17 CIVIL TRIAL ORDER for cases assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. (tg)
October 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for hearing October 5, 2018, is VACATED and taken off calendar, and the following dates are set. *SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS.* (es)
September 24, 2018 Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 court days, filed by Plaintiff Richard Mager.. (McMillan, Heather)
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference is set for 10/5/2018 at 1:30 p.m. See document for details. (tg)
August 21, 2018 Filing 13 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg)
August 20, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Richard Mager, (McMillan, Heather)
August 20, 2018 Filing 11 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Richard Mager.. (McMillan, Heather)
August 20, 2018 Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Andrew Edward Ainsworth counsel for Plaintiff Richard Mager. Adding Andrew E. Ainsworth as counsel of record for Richard Mager for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Richard Mager. (Attorney Andrew Edward Ainsworth added to party Richard Mager(pty:pla))(Ainsworth, Andrew)
August 20, 2018 Filing 9 Notice of No Related Cases and No Pendency of Other Actions (Matheis, Charles)
August 20, 2018 Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants FedEx Corporation, Federal Express Corporation, Fedex Express identifying FedEx Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Matheis, Charles)
August 20, 2018 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants FedEx Corporation, Federal Express Corporation, Fedex Express, served on Disclosure Statement; Notice of No Related Cases; Certificate and Notice of Interested Parties. (Matheis, Charles)
August 20, 2018 Filing 6 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants All Defendants, identifying FedEx Corporation. (Attorney Charles W Matheis, Jr added to party Does(pty:dft))(Matheis, Charles)
August 20, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap)
August 20, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
August 20, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap)
August 17, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50 inclusive, FedEx Corporation, Federal Express Corporation, Fedex Express., filed by plaintiff Richard Mager. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/19/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
August 17, 2018 NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants FedEx Corporation, Federal Express Corporation, Fedex Express. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap)
August 17, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants FedEx Corporation, Federal Express Corporation, Fedex Express. (Matheis, Charles)
August 17, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior, case number 30-2018-0100799 Receipt No: 0973-22277323 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants FedEx Corporation, Fedex Express, Federal Express, Federal Express Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Charles W. Matheis, Jr. In Support of Notice of Removal of Civil Action Under Article III of the U.S. Constitution and 28 U.S.C. 1332, 1441 and 1446 Volume 1 of 2, #2 Declaration of Charles W. Matheis, Jr. In Support of Notice of Removal of Civil Action Under Article III of the U.S. Constitution and 28 U.S.C. 1332, 1441 and 1446 Volume 2 of 2) (Attorney Charles W Matheis, Jr added to party FedEx Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Charles W Matheis, Jr added to party Fedex Express(pty:dft), Attorney Charles W Matheis, Jr added to party Federal Express(pty:dft), Attorney Charles W Matheis, Jr added to party Federal Express Corporation(pty:dft))(Matheis, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richard Mager v. Fedex Express et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fedex Express
Represented By: Charles W Matheis, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FedEx Corporation
Represented By: Charles W Matheis, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Express
Represented By: Charles W Matheis, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation
Represented By: Charles W Matheis, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-50 inclusive
Represented By: Charles W Matheis, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Mager
Represented By: Heather K McMillan
Represented By: Daniel P Stevens
Represented By: Andrew Edward Ainsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Alternative dispute resolution (adr) provider: Hiro Aragaki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?