Heaven Ervin v. General Motors LLC, et al
| Heaven Ervin |
| Does 1 to 50 and General Motors LLC |
| 8:2018cv01525 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| James V Selna |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 12/3/2018 at 11:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with a completed Exhibit A, by 11/26/2018. (kt)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Initial Order Following Filing of Complaint Assigned to Judge Selna (Docket Nos 8 and 9) filed by defendant General Motors LLC. (Jung, Robin) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (jlen) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (jlen) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE Assignment to US Judges filed by defendant General Motors LLC. (Jung, Robin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Karen E. Scott. New Case Number 8:18-cv-01525 JVS (KESx). (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1 to 50, General Motors LLC, filed by plaintiff Heaven Ervin. (Filed in state court 4/18/2018, submitted as document 1, attachment 3) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Heaven Ervin, upon Defendant General Motors LLC served on 7/27/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service, Registered Agent for Service of Process, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (Filed in state court 8/2/2018, submitted as document 1, attachment 9) (esa) |
| COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, Jury Demand, filed by defendant General Motors LLC. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 10)(esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant General Motors LLC, identifying General Motors Holdings LLC; General Motors Company. (Jung, Robin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff General Motors LLC. (Jung, Robin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, Central Justice Center, case number 30-2018-00986929-CU-PL-CJC Receipt No: 0973-22315942 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robin Jung in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Summons, #3 Exhibit B - Complaint, #4 Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit D - ADR Info Package, #6 Exhibit E - Notice Case Assignment, #7 Exhibit F - Notice Hearing, #8 Exhibit G - Minute Order re CMC, #9 Exhibit H - Proof Service Summons, #10 Exhibit I - GM Answer Complaint, #11 Exhibit J - LexisNexis Address Search Results, #12 Exhibit K - DHCS 3-22-17 Letter to Pff Atty re Medi-Cal Costs (NEW), #13 Proof of Service) (Attorney Robin H Jung added to party General Motors LLC(pty:pla))(Jung, Robin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
