Carmen Jarediaz Odom v. 3M Company et al
| Carmen Jarediaz Odom |
| AEARO Technologies LLC and 3M Company |
| 8:2019cv00275 |
| February 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J Guilford |
| Karen E Scott |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
ORDER ON PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING RULINGS BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION #26 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (es)
|
| Filing 27 SUPPLEMENT to Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Rulings By The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation #26 re [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PARTIES JOINT MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Branscome, Kimberly) |
| Filing 26 Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Rulings By The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation filed by Defendant 3M Company. Motion set for hearing on 4/15/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Branscome, Kimberly) |
| Filing 25 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant 3M Company identifying 3M Company as Corporate Parent. (Branscome, Kimberly) |
| Filing 24 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kimberly O Branscome counsel for Defendant 3M Company. Adding Kimberly Branscome as counsel of record for 3M Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Attorney Kimberly O Branscome added to party 3M Company(pty:dft))(Branscome, Kimberly) |
| Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom, upon Defendant AEARO Technologies LLC served on 2/28/2019, answer due 3/21/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mai Yang, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Robinson, Mark) |
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom, upon Defendant 3M Company served on 2/28/2019, answer due 3/21/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mai Yang, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Robinson, Mark) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Clinton Casperson on behalf of Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Rebecca King on behalf of Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Shawn Fox on behalf of Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Sean Patrick Tracey on behalf of Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: SACV19-00267 AG (KESx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick and Judge Josephine L. Staton to Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge SACV19-00275 AG (KESx). Signed by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (lwag)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice (Other) #5 . The following error(s) was found: Incorrect Event of Notice (other) was selected. The correct event category is Related Case. No further action is required unless the Court so directs. (et) |
| Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant 3M Company, AEARO Technologies LLC amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Robinson, Mark) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 3M Company, AEARO Technologies LLC. (et) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Clinton Casperson. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom. (Robinson, Mark) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Rebecca B King. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Shawn P Fox. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Sean Patrick Tracey. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case filed by Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom. (Robinson, Mark) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom, identifying 3M Company, Aearo Technologies, LLC, Robinson Calcagnie, Inc., Tracey & Fox. (Robinson, Mark) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom. (Robinson, Mark) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom. (Robinson, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23202131 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Carmen Jarediaz Odom. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G) (Attorney Mark P Robinson, Jr added to party Carmen Jarediaz Odom(pty:pla))(Robinson, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
