Adam Ghadiri v. ALs Automotive et al
| Adam Ghadiri |
| ALs Automotive, Inc., Graciela Mendez, ALs Automotive and Alvaro Mendez |
| 8:2019cv00384 |
| February 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Adam Ghadiri as to AL's Automotive, AL's Automotive, Inc., Alvaro Mendez, Graciela Mendez (bm) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri, upon Defendant ALs Automotive served on 3/8/2019, answer due 3/29/2019; ALs Automotive, Inc. served on 3/8/2019, answer due 3/29/2019; Alvaro Mendez served on 3/8/2019, answer due 3/29/2019; Graciela Mendez served on 3/8/2019, answer due 3/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Alvaro Mendez, Employee in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (bm) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE ON ALL PARTIES: 1. NOTICE OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM; 2. NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES JUDGES; AND 3. STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES filed by plaintiff Adam Ghadiri, served on 3/11/19. (bm) |
Filing 11
ORDER RE APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: granting #7 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (bm)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (et) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. (et) |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Graciela Mendez. (et) |
| Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Alvaro Mendez. (et) |
| Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant ALs Automotive, Inc.. (et) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant ALs Automotive. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT against Defendants ALs Automotive, ALs Automotive, Inc., Alvaro Mendez, Graciela Mendez. Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth.(Filing fee $ 400 PAID.), filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
