Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza Carolina v. David Marin
Petitioner: Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza Carolina
Respondent: David Marin
Case Number: 8:2019cv00951
Filed: May 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DISMISSAL ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #14 . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the separately filed stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (hr)
June 20, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation to Dismiss Case #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect. Other error(s) with document(s): 1. The correct case number is SA CV 19-00951-DSF (AS). 2. The signature line should read Alka Sagar, United States Magistrate Judge. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr)
June 18, 2019 Filing 14 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Respondent David Marin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Thayer, Damon)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response #11 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the parties' stipulation, that Respondent shall have up to and including June 21, 2019, to file a response to the Motion for Emergency Stay (Docket Entry No. 2). The Emergency Stay will remain in effect until the Court issues a ruling on the matter. (hr)
June 13, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Other error(s) with document(s): - Stipulation noticed before incorrect Judge. All documents must be noticed to and served courtesy copies to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (See G.O. 05-07). - Correct case number is CV19-00951-DSF (ASx). This is a discovery case. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr)
June 12, 2019 Filing 11 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Order, #9 filed by Respondent David Marin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Thayer, Damon)
May 23, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Process Receipt and Return (USM-285) Summons and Petition #6 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA. Other error(s) with document(s): Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) Modified on 5/23/2019 (hr).
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONDENT TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE MOTION FOR EMERGENCY STAY by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response #8 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the parties' stipulation, that Respondent shall have up to and including June 12, 2019, to file a response to the Motion for Emergency Stay (Docket Entry No. 2). The Emergency Stay will remain in effect until the Court issues a ruling on the matter. (hr)
May 22, 2019 Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Resonse as to EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay pending petition for habeas corpus #2 filed by Respondent David Marin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Damon A Thayer added to party David Marin(pty:res))(Thayer, Damon)
May 22, 2019 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by petitioner Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza Carolina, re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay pending petition for habeas corpus #2 served on May 21, 2019. (Bakeman, Willard)
May 21, 2019 Filing 6 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of summons and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 upon David Marin served on 5/21/2019, answer due 7/22/2019, served by personal, mail service, by Federal statute, upon USAttorney, Att General. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit receipts)(Bakeman, Willard)
May 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING MOTION for Emergency Stay #2 . (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS). (jp)
May 20, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car)
May 20, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car)
May 18, 2019 Filing 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay pending petition for habeas corpus filed by petitioner Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza. (Bakeman, Willard)
May 18, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. 0973-23764031 for $5 filing fee, filed by petitioner Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit opinion) (Attorney Willard Patrick Bakeman, III added to party Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza(pty:pet))(Bakeman, Willard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza Carolina v. David Marin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza Carolina
Represented By: Willard Patrick Bakeman, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Marin
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney SA-CV
Represented By: Damon A Thayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?