Misty Marler v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc. et al
| Misty Marler |
| American Medical Collection Agency, Optum360 Services, Inc., Quest Diagnostics, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100 |
| 8:2019cv01091 |
| June 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics, Inc., identifying BlackRock Inc., Vanguard Group, American International Group, Inc., National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, Zurich American Insurance Company, Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc., Freedom Specialty Insurance Company. (Lally, Amy) |
| Filing 20 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Amy P Lally counsel for Defendant Quest Diagnostics, Inc.. Adding Amy P. Lally as counsel of record for Quest Diagnostics, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. (Attorney Amy P Lally added to party Quest Diagnostics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lally, Amy) |
Filing 19
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Joint Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending Ruling on Consolidation and Transfer by JPML #14 . SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Made JS-6. Case Terminated. (twdb)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Petition to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation [Local Rule 83-1.4.3] filed by Defendant Optum360 Services, Inc.. (Akerman, Alexander) |
| Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Optum360 Services, Inc. identifying Optum Rocket, Inc., OptumInsight, Inc., OptumInsight Holdings, LLC, Optum, Inc., United HealthCare Services, Inc., UnitedHealth Group Incorporated as Corporate Parent. (Akerman, Alexander) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Optum360 Services, Inc., identifying Optum360 Services, Inc., Optum Rocket, Inc., OptumInsight, Inc., OptumInsight Holdings, LLC, Optum, Inc., United HealthCare Services, Inc., UnitedHealthcare Group Incorporated. (Akerman, Alexander) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Alexander Akerman counsel for Defendant Optum360 Services, Inc.. Adding Alexander Akerman as counsel of record for Defendant Optum360 Services, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Optum360 Services, Inc.. (Akerman, Alexander) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Ruling on Consolidation and Transfer by JPML filed by Defendant Optum360 Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation for Stay of Proceedings Pending Ruling on Consolidation and Transfer by JPML)(Attorney Alexander Akerman added to party Optum360 Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Akerman, Alexander) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Misty Marler, upon Defendant Quest Diagnostics, Inc. served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Robinson, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Misty Marler, upon Defendant Optum360 Services, Inc. served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Robinson, Daniel) |
|
Filing 11
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition #4 as to Defendants American Medical Collection Agency, Optum360 Services, Inc.,and Quest Diagnostics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Optum360, #2 Quest) (jtil) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #4 filed by Plaintiff Misty Marler. (Robinson, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #4 filed by Plaintiff Misty Marler. (Robinson, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by Plaintiff Misty Marler., Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #4 filed by Plaintiff Misty Marler. (Robinson, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants American Medical Collection Agency, Optum360 Services, Inc., Quest Diagnostics, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Misty Marler(Robinson, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Misty Marler, identifying Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Optum360 Services, Inc., American Medical Collection Agency. (Robinson, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Misty Marler. (Robinson, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23851653 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Misty Marler. (Attorney Daniel S Robinson added to party Misty Marler(pty:pla))(Robinson, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
