Hamed Kabir v. United States of America
| Hamed Kabir |
| United States of America |
| 8:2019cv01353 |
| July 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| James V Selna |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REPLY TO PETITIONERS OPPOSITION filed by Respondent United States of America. (LeBlanc, Paul) |
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by Judge James V. Selna: Petitioner Hamed Kabir ("Kabir") has applied for the appointment of counsel. Kabir has not made a sufficient showing to warrant the appointment of counsel. The application is denied. (es)
|
|
Filing 10
VERIFIED APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and ORDER by Judge James V. Selna. (es)
|
| Filing 9 JUDICIAL NOTICE filed by Petitioner Hamed Kabir. (es) |
| Filing 8 Memorandum of Law Original Constitutional Non-Statutory Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Hamed Kabir. (es) |
| Filing 7 Request for Assistance of Counsel filed by petitioner Hamed Kabir. (es) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss #4 filed by Petitioner Hamed Kabir. (es) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER RE BRIEFING by Judge James V. Selna: On July 10, 2019, Defendant Hamed Kabir filed a "Demand for Immediate Subrogation & Exoneration" [Dkt 1]. The Court deemed it a motion pursuant to 28 USC Section 2255. On July 16, 2019, the Government filed a Motion to Dismiss [Dkt 4]. Any opposition to the motion to dismiss shall be filed by August 30, 2019. Any reply brief shall be filed by September 13, 2019 whereupon the matter stands submitted. (es)
|
| Filing 4 GOVERNMENTS MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE SUBROGATION & EXONERATION OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE filed by Respondent United States of America (LeBlanc, Paul) Modified on 7/17/2019 (es). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of Assistant United States Attorney Paul LeBlanc on behalf of Respondent United States of America. (Attorney Paul C LeBlanc added to party United States of America(pty:res))(LeBlanc, Paul) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna for motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 USC 2255 assigned to Judge James V. Selna. For docketing entries refer to CR Case # 8:18-cr-35-JVS, filed by petitioner Hamed Kabir. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hamed Kabir v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney SA-CR |
| Represented By: | Paul C LeBlanc |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Hamed Kabir | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
