Patricia Weber v. Andrew Saul
| Patricia Weber |
| Andrew Saul |
| 8:2019cv01537 |
| August 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| David O Carter |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams for all further proceedings. Please use the case number SACV19-1537 PLA on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Esther H Kim added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Kim, Esther) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Patricia Weber, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 8/23/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (ch)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Andrew Saul. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Patricia Weber, (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Patricia Weber. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Patricia Weber. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24229162 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Patricia Weber. (Attorney Lawrence D Rohlfing added to party Patricia Weber(pty:pla))(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patricia Weber v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney SA-CV |
| Represented By: | Esther H Kim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patricia Weber | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence D Rohlfing |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
