Bryan Williams v. F. Richard Digiorgio et al
| Bryan Williams |
| Saint Rocke, F. Richard Digiorgio and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
| 8:2019cv01751 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On 11/4/2019, Plaintiff voluntarily withdrew that claim. (Doc. #14 .) Accordingly, the Court DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause. (jp)
|
| Filing 14 WITHDRAWAL of filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. Failure to timely or adequately respond may, without further warning, result in dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 USC 1367(c). (jp)
|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant F. Richard Digiorgio served on 10/11/2019, answer due 11/1/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon F. Richard Digiorgio by Nate Samkins, Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 11 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Saint Rocke answer now due 11/8/2019, filed by defendant Saint Rocke.(Attorney Michael Joseph Karlin added to party Saint Rocke(pty:dft))(Karlin, Michael) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant Saint Rocke served on 9/20/2019, answer due 10/11/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Saint Rocke by Joseph Kartampalic, Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tg) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants F. Richard Digiorgio and Saint Rocke. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24439895 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Bryan Williams(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
