Helios Streaming, LLC et al v. Starz Entertainment, LLC et al
| Helios Streaming, LLC and Ideahub, Inc. |
| Starz Entertainment, LLC and Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. |
| 8:2019cv02140 |
| November 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| James V Selna |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 145 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., Starz Entertainment, LLC.(Caixeiro, Manny) |
Filing 25
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 03/02/20 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 2/24/2020. (rrp)
|
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Leonard A. Monfredo to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24863851) #23 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed. (lt) |
| Filing 23 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Leonard A. Monfredo to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24863851) filed by plaintiff Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Craft, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT TO JANUARY 3, 2020 #21 by Judge James V. Selna (lc)
|
| Filing 21 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., Starz Entertainment, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint By Not More Than 30 Days (L.R. 8-3))(Caixeiro, Manny) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Manny Joseph Caixeiro on behalf of Defendants Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., Starz Entertainment, LLC (Attorney Manny Joseph Caixeiro added to party Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.(pty:dft), Attorney Manny Joseph Caixeiro added to party Starz Entertainment, LLC(pty:dft))(Caixeiro, Manny) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, GRANTING #17 Non-Resident Attorney Timothy Devlin APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff HELIOS STREAMING, LLC; and IDEAHUB, INC., designating Jeffrey F. Craft as local counsel. (es)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF LODGING filed PROPOSED ORDER re APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Timothy Devlin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24823316) #17 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Craft, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Timothy Devlin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24823316) filed by plaintiff Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc.. (Craft, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 16 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiffs Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc. (Craft, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc., (Craft, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Leonard Monfredo. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Timithy Devlin. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. (lh) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Starz Entertainment, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding filed by Plaintiffs Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc.. (Craft, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc.. (Craft, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc.. (Craft, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc.. (Craft, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc.. (Craft, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24738982 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Helios Streaming, LLC, Ideahub, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10) (Attorney Jeffrey Francis Craft added to party Helios Streaming, LLC (pty:pla), Attorney Jeffrey Francis Craft added to party Ideahub, Inc. (pty:pla))(Craft, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
