James Duffy v. Joseph Kowal et al
| James Duffy and Jim Duffy |
| Joseph D. Kowal, Warren R. Markowitz and Does 1 thru 20 |
| 8:2019cv02265 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION for Order Arbitration of Claims filed by Plaintiff James Duffy.(Catanzarite, Kenneth) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Joseph D. Kowal #14 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Motion to Dismiss on file dated 1/15/2020 (Dkt no. #18 ). (jp) |
| Filing 17 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Defendant Warren R. Markowitz. (jp) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Join in Motion to Dismiss by Markowitz #15 filed by Defendant Joseph D. Kowal. (jp) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Duffyto Order to Show Cause, #12 Response to Order to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution (Catanzarite, Kenneth) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss in Accordance with FRCP Rules 12(b)(3)(6) and (7), and to Compel Arbitration Under Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 USC Sub-section 1, Et Seq filed by Defendant Warren R Markowitz, ESQ. (jp) Modified on 1/9/2020 (jp). |
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Joseph D. Kowal filed by Plaintiff James Duffy. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1) (Catanzarite, Kenneth) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Minute Order filed by Plaintiff James Duffy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Catanzarite, Kenneth) |
Filing 12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Counsel is hereby ordered to show cause in writing no later than 1/13/2020, why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41, for lack of prosecution. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION). (jp)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE Notice of Initial Standing Order filed by Plaintiff James Duffy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Catanzarite, Kenneth) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Duffy, upon Defendant Warren R. Markowitz served on 12/7/2019, answer due 12/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Warren R. Markowitz, Esq. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Catanzarite, Kenneth) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Duffy, upon Defendant Joseph D. Kowal served on 11/27/2019, answer due 12/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Joseph Kowal in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Catanzarite, Kenneth) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Joseph D. Kowal, Warren R. Markowitz. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Duffy. (Catanzarite, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Duffy. (Catanzarite, Kenneth) |
| Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff James Duffy, identifying Plaintiff and Defendants. (Catanzarite, Kenneth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24817023 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff James Duffy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Kenneth Joseph Catanzarite added to party James Duffy(pty:pla))(Catanzarite, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
