TCT Mobile (US) Inc. et al v. Cellular Communications Equipment LLC
| TCT Mobile (US) Inc. and Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd. |
| Cellular Communications Equipment LLC |
| 8:2020cv00702 |
| April 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| James V Selna |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 7/27/2020 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 7/20/2020. (lb)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER Granting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #13 , Defendant Cellular Communications Equipment LLC answer due 6/8/2020 by Judge James V. Selna (es)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs TCT Mobile (US) Inc., Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Benson, Robert) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff TCT Mobile (US) Inc., Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd., upon Defendant Cellular Communications Equipment LLC served on 4/17/2020, answer due 5/8/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cellular Communications Equipment LLC in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Benson, Robert) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Cellular Communications Equipment LLC. (es) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd., TCT Mobile (US) Inc.. (Benson, Robert) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Cellular Communications Equipment LLC, Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd., TCT Mobile (US) Inc.. (Benson, Robert) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 7.1 filed by Plaintiffs Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd., TCT Mobile (US) Inc. (Benson, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd., TCT Mobile (US) Inc.. (Benson, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd., TCT Mobile (US) Inc.. (Benson, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-26038107 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs TCT Mobile (US) Inc., Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Robert J Benson added to party Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd.(pty:pla), Attorney Robert J Benson added to party TCT Mobile (US) Inc. (pty:pla))(Benson, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
