United States of America v. Robert Anthony Sandlin
| United States of America |
| Robert Anthony Sandlin |
| First Foundation Bank |
| 8:2020cv01539 |
| August 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 3205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Order for Issuance of Final Order of Continuing Garnishment filed by PLAINTIFF United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service) (Mockler, Brendan) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTiFF United States of America, re APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment Robert Anthony Sandlin TO GARNISHEE FIRST FOUNDATION BANK [28 U.S.C. 3205(b)] AND CLERKS NOTICE OF ENFORCEMENT TO DEBTOR [28 U.S.C. 3202(b)] #6 , Notice of Continuing Garnishment #9 , Writ Issued #8 , Order, #7 served on 10/7/2020. (Mockler, Brendan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF United States of America, served on 10/07/2020. (Mockler, Brendan) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by garnishee First Foundation Bank.(twdb) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff United States of America, re Writ Issued #8 , Order, #7 served on 9/8/2020. (Mockler, Brendan) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF CONTINUING POSTJUDGMENT GARNISHMENT TO DEBTOR FIRST FOUNDATION BANK [28 U.S.C. 3205(b)] #6 . (twdb) |
| Filing 8 WRIT of CONTINUING GARNISHMENT issued. [28 U.S.C. 3205(C)(1) #6 . (twdb) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO ISSUE WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT [28 U.S.C. 3205(c)(1) AND ORDER TO ISSUE CLERK'S NOTICE OF CONTINUING POSTJUDGMENT GARNISHMENT 28 U.S.C. 3202(d)] by Judge David O. Carter, re APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment ] #6 . (twdb)
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment Robert Anthony Sandlin TO GARNISHEE FIRST FOUNDATION BANK [28 U.S.C. 3205(b)] AND CLERKS NOTICE OF ENFORCEMENT TO DEBTOR [28 U.S.C. 3202(b)] filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Writ of Continuing Garnishment, #2 Clerk's Notice, #3 Proposed Order) (Mockler, Brendan) |
| Filing 5 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to United States District Judge David O. Carter. The case number on all documents filed with the Court should read 8:20-cv-01539 DOC. Please refer to the assigned judge's Procedures and Schedules, available on the Court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov/judges-requirements, for additional information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (esa) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 3 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to clerical error. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been reassigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. New Case Number 8:20-cv-01539 DOC. (esa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Mockler, Brendan) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT TO GARNISHEE ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Writ of Continuing Garnishment, #2 Clerk's Notice, #3 Proposed Order) (Attorney Brendan T Mockler added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Mockler, Brendan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
