In re Bruce Elieff
| Kathy Elieff, Todd Kurtin, United States of America, Bruce Elieff, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Bruce Elieff and Howard M. Ehrenberg |
| Citi Investment Capital, Inc. |
| 8:2020cv01780 |
| September 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: On October 16, 2020, the Court issued an Order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution #7 . On October 20, 2020, the Court received a Notice of Bankruptcy Appeal Record Availability re Certificate of Readiness and Completion of Record on Appeal. In light of this notice and the Appellant's 11/19/20 deadline to file an opening brief, the Court hereby orders the OSC discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE RE: BANKRUPTCY RECORD COMPLETE. Please note, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8010(b)(3), this Court has received from the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court either the record for the above-captioned appeal or notice that the record is available electronically. The parties are responsible for reading and complying with all requirements, including briefing, provided in this notice. Appellant must serve and file a brief by 11/19/2020. (jp) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Bankruptcy Appeal Record Availability re Certificate of Readiness and Completion of Record on Appeal #1 . (jp) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Appellant Citi Investment Capital, Inc.to Order to Show Cause, #7 (Prince, Miles) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Appellant is hereby ordered to show cause in writing, on or before 10/23/2020, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF TRANSFER OF APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT by U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit; Acknowledgment of receipt by U.S. District Court on 9/18/20. (esa) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT OF ELECTION TO TRANSFER APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT filed by Appellee Howard M. Ehrenberg. (esa) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION filed by Appellant Citi Investment Capital, Inc. (esa) |
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION Re: Order granting Chapter 11 Trustee for (1) Authorizing sale of real property; (2) Approving overbid procedures; (3) Determining buyer/bidder to be good faith purchaser; (4) Approving compensation of real estate broker; and (5) Authorizing distribution of sale proceeds. entered on 8/21/20 by Bankruptcy Judge Erithe Smith, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 9/2/20. Bankruptcy Court case number: 8:19-bk-13858-ES, Adversary number: NA, BAP case number: cc-20-1220., filed by appellant Citi Investment Capital, Inc. (Attachments: #1 bk dkt) (esa) Modified on 9/21/2020 (esa).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
