Loan Vo v. Princess Cruises Lines Ltd
| Loan Vo |
| Princess Cruises Lines Ltd, DOES 1-10, inclusive and Princess Cruises Lines Ltd doing business as Princess Cruises |
| 8:2020cv01884 |
| September 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL CASE. The Court hereby orders ALL pending hearing dates VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court retains jurisdiction for thirty (30) days to vacate this order and reopen the action upon showing of good cause that the settlement has not been consummated. re: Notice of Settlement #15 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Loan Vo. (Friedman, Stanley) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 12/14/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (See attached Order for complete details.) (kd)
|
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nicholas S Politis counsel for Defendant Princess Cruises Lines Ltd. Adding Nicholas S. Politis as counsel of record for Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.. (Attorney Nicholas S Politis added to party Princess Cruises Lines Ltd(pty:dft))(Politis, Nicholas) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Princess Cruises Lines Ltd, identifying Carnival Corporation & plc. (Chang, Melody) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Princess Cruises Lines Ltd.(Attorney Melody C Chang added to party Princess Cruises Lines Ltd(pty:dft))(Chang, Melody) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Loan Vo, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 served on October 16, 2020. (Friedman, Stanley) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Loan Vo, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #7 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 served on October 6, 2020. (Friedman, Stanley) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Princess Cruises Lines Ltd. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Loan Vo. (Friedman, Stanley) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Loan Vo, identifying Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.. (Friedman, Stanley) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Loan Vo. (Friedman, Stanley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28317338 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Loan Vo. (Attorney Stanley L Friedman added to party Loan Vo(pty:pla))(Friedman, Stanley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
