Latisha Vargas v. Broker Solutions, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Latisha Vargas
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive and Broker Solutions, Inc. doing business as New American Funding
Case Number: 8:2021cv00427
Filed: March 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2021 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Broker Solutions, Inc..(White, Darrell)
April 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #9 by Judge Josephine L. Staton, the Stipulation is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant Broker Solutions dba New American Funding to respond to the Complaint by answer, motion, or otherwise, shall be extended to 5/6/2021. (jp)
April 5, 2021 Filing 9 First REQUEST to Extend Time to File Answer to 5/6/2021 filed by Defendant Broker Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order granting stipulation) (Attorney Darrell Peter White added to party Broker Solutions, Inc.(pty:dft)) (White, Darrell)
March 8, 2021 Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku)
March 8, 2021 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Broker Solutions, Inc. (lh)
March 8, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
March 8, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh)
March 8, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Latisha Vargas, identifying Broker Solutions, Inc.. (Friedman, Todd)
March 8, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Latisha Vargas. (Friedman, Todd)
March 8, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Latisha Vargas. (Friedman, Todd)
March 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30871054 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Latisha Vargas. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Latisha Vargas(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Latisha Vargas v. Broker Solutions, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Broker Solutions, Inc. doing business as New American Funding
Represented By: Darrell Peter White
Represented By: Michelle Elaine Soon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latisha Vargas
Represented By: Adrian Robert Bacon
Represented By: Thomas Edward Wheeler
Represented By: Meghan Elisabeth George
Represented By: Todd M Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?