Reynaldo Iniestra v. Earthscapes Landscape, Inc. et al
| Reynaldo Iniestra |
| Earthscapes Landscape, Inc. and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv01180 |
| July 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter: On the Court's own motion, Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings #11 is continued to September 27, 2021 at 8:30 am.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kdu) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 13 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to on the pleadings #11 filed by Defendant Earthscapes Landscape, Inc.. (Becker, Erick) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to on the pleadings #11 filed by Plaintiff Reynaldo Iniestra. (Jackson, Armond) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to on the pleadings filed by Defendant Earthscapes Landscape, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 8/30/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Edward J. Farrell ISO Motion, #2 Appendix Request for Judicial Notice ISO Motion, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Becker, Erick) |
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 9/27/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (kd)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Earthscapes Landscape, Inc..(Becker, Erick) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Earthscapes Landscape, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Reynaldo Iniestra. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/3/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Movant Earthscapes Landscape, Inc. identifying none as Corporate Parent. (Becker, Erick) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Earthscapes Landscape, Inc., (Becker, Erick) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-01204241 Receipt No: ACACDC-31598550 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Earthscapes Landscape, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit Proof Of Service) (Attorney Erick J Becker added to party Earthscapes Landscape, Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Becker, Erick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
