Carolina Yanez v. Denis McDonough
| Carolina Yanez |
| DENIS R MCDONOUGH and Denis McDonough |
| Phyllis Cheng |
| 8:2021cv01283 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF MEDIATION DATE filed. Mediation set for December 14, 2022.(Cheng, Phyllis) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Phyllis Cheng has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst) |
| Filing 21 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq. may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 12/16/2022 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Defendant Denis McDonough(La Scala, Paul) |
Filing 20
ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES, PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL by Judge Cormac J. Carney. (rrp)
|
|
Filing 19
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Discovery cut-off 12/15/2022. LAST DATE TO HEAR MOTIONS is 2/13/2023. Last date to conduct settlement conference is 12/29/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 4/17/2023 at 3:00 p.m. Jury Trial set for 4/25/2023 at 8:30 a.m. (rrp)
|
| Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant Denis McDonough.. (La Scala, Paul) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on January 13, 2022. (rrp) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Denis McDonough.(La Scala, Paul) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Granting Stipulation to Amend/Correct #13 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count III of Plaintiffs Complaint shall be stricken. (twdb)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. A Word or Wordperfect version of the proposed order should also be emailed to the chambers generic email address. Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.4.1- Proposed orders not lodged with a main document shall be electronically lodged as an attachment to a Notice of Lodging. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION to AMEND/ Stipulation of Dismissal of Count III Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carolina Yanez.(Bennett, Paul) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Denis McDonough answer now due 11/10/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Denis McDonough.(Attorney Paul B La Scala added to party Denis McDonough(pty:dft))(La Scala, Paul) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:21-cv-01283 CJC(DFMx). (rn) |
| Filing 10 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Bennett, Paul) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carolina Yanez, upon Defendant Denis McDonough served on 8/16/2021, answer due 10/15/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to illegible. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Illegible. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Bennett, Paul) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Denis McDonough. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Merrick Garland US Attorney General, #2 Civil Service Clerk US Attorney Office) (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carolina Yanez, (Bennett, Paul) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carolina Yanez. (Bennett, Paul) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carolina Yanez. (Bennett, Paul) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carolina Yanez. (Bennett, Paul) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carolina Yanez. (Bennett, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31716114 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Carolina Yanez. (Attorney Paul Vivian Bennett added to party Carolina Yanez(pty:pla))(Bennett, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
