Carrell Hawkins et al v. Catalyst Forward Group et al
| Carrell Hawkins |
| Catalyst Forward Group and US Foods, Inc. |
| Shiftablehr |
| 8:2021cv01373 |
| August 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Labor: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Annie Hsinyi Chen counsel for Defendant US Foods, Inc.. Adding Annie H. Chen as counsel of record for US Foods, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant US Foods, Inc.. (Attorney Annie Hsinyi Chen added to party US Foods, Inc.(pty:dft))(Chen, Annie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant US Foods, Inc., identifying US Foods Holding Corp.. (Liburt, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant US Foods, Inc.. (Liburt, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Orange, case number 30-2021-01197275-CU-OE-CXC Receipt No: ACACDC-31846605 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant US Foods, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Attorney Joseph C Liburt added to party US Foods, Inc.(pty:dft))(Liburt, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
