John Roe 1 et al v. The State Bar of California et al
| John Roe 1, Jane Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 3 and John Roe 2 |
| The State Bar of California, Tyler Technologies, Inc., Kevan Schwitzer, Rick Rankin, Does 4 through 10, inclusive and Doe |
| 8:2022cv00983 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 136 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court. (es) |
Filing 135
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING CASE by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: On May 1, 2023, the Court exercised its discretion to decline supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims and closed this case. See Dkt. 134. Plaintiffs have informed the Court that the state court suspended the case after removal and thus wish for an order of remand rather than dismissal. The dismissal order is VACATED. The Clerk of Court is directed to REMAND this case to Orange County Superior Court and CLOSE this case. (es)
|
|
Filing 134
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order Declining Supplemental Jurisdiction and Closing Case by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Given the Court's decision to decline jurisdiction, it will not make any further rulings on Defendants' motion to dismiss. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.] (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es)
|
| Filing 133 SUPPLEMENT to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #131 filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 132 SUPPLEMENT to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #131 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
|
Filing 131
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Supplemental Jurisdiction by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: The Court invites the parties to address this issue by submitting supplemental briefing within ten (10) days. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court will take this issue under submission without a hearing. [See document for further information.] (es)
|
|
Filing 130
ORDER re: Defendants' Supplemental Motions to Dismiss (Dkts. 112, 113) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Defendants' Supplemental Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. Plaintiffs' antitrust claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate order will follow regarding Plaintiffs' remaining claims. [See document for further information.] (es)
|
| Filing 129 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 3/7/2023 10:03 a.m. to 10:52 a.m. re Transcript #128 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (apr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 128 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 3/7/2023 10:03 a.m. to 10:52 a.m.. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: BABYKIN COURTHOUSE SERVICES, phone number (626) 963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 4/21/2023. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/1/2023. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/29/2023. (apr) |
|
Filing 127
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Denying #41 MOTION for Order. Plaintiffs' Motion is DENIED. If the Court denies the pending supplemental motions to dismiss or retains supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims, Plaintiffs will be required to file an amended complaint reflecting their given names. Until then, Plaintiff need not take affirmative action. (et)
|
| Filing 126 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Sherman Act Claim in Second Amended Complaint #112 , Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint #113 Post Submission Based On New Evidence filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 125 TRANSCRIPT ORDER as to Defendant The State Bar of California for Court Smart (CS). Court will contact Martiza DeJesus at mdejesus@cooley.com with further instructions regarding this order. Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the transcription company. (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 124 MINUTES OF HEARING ON SUPPLEMENTAL MOTIONS TO DISMISS #112 #113 Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Case called and counsel make their appearances. Counsel argue motions. Court takes matters under submission. Court Reporter: CS 03/07/23. (es) |
| Filing 123 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Walter Waidelich counsel for Defendant The State Bar of California. Walter Waidelich is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Waidelich, Walter) |
|
Filing 122
ORDER REGARDING THE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL MOTIONS TO DISMISS by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, re Stipulation for Hearing #121 , The Court, now ORDERS as follows: The Court resets the hearing on the supplemental motions to dismiss the federal antitrust claims in Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint, filed by the State Bar and Tyler, (see Dkts. 112, 113), for March 7, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. (es)
|
| Filing 121 Joint STIPULATION for Hearing re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines, #120 filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Demas, Tiana) |
|
Filing 120
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order Setting Hearing on Supplemental Motions to Dismiss by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: re: Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Sherman Act Claim in Second Amended Complaint #112 , Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint #113 . The motions are fully briefed. The Court sets the motions for hearing on February 16, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.] (es)
|
| Filing 119 REPLY In Support of Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Sherman Act Claim in Second Amended Complaint #112 filed by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.. (Timm, Zachary) |
| Filing 118 REPLY in Support of Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint #113 filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 117 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Sherman Act Claim in Second Amended Complaint #112 , Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint #113 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 116 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Sherman Act Claim in Second Amended Complaint #112 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 115 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint #113 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 114 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint #113 filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 113 Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Supplemental Motion to Dismiss to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, #2 Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Supplemental Motion to Dismiss to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit A to Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Supplemental Motion to Dismiss to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit B to Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Supplemental Motion to Dismiss to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit C to Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Supplemental Motion to Dismiss to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, #6 Exhibit D to Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Supplemental Motion to Dismiss to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, #7 Exhibit E to Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Supplemental Motion to Dismiss to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, #8 Exhibit F to Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Supplemental Motion to Dismiss to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, #9 Proposed Order) (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 112 Supplemental NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Sherman Act Claim in Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Timm, Zachary) |
| Filing 111 STATEMENT in response to Court Orders filed by Defendant Rick Rankin re: Scheduling Order #110 , Order on Motion to Dismiss Party,,,,,,,,,,,,,, #94 . (Anderson, Justin) |
|
Filing 110
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for Defendants' Supplemental Motions to Dismiss the Sherman Antitrust Act Claims in the Second Amended Complaint. (nbo)
|
| Filing 109 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick Granting #107 Defendants' EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time. (nbo) |
| Filing 108 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Joint EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 11/21/2022 re Amended Complaint/Petition, #100 #107 and Declaration of Lenore Albert filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 107 Joint EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 11/21/2022 re Amended Complaint/Petition, #100 filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Ex Parte Application to Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint, #2 Declaration of B. Anderson in Support of Ex Parte Application to Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit A to Declaration of B. Anderson in Support of Ex Parte Application to Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit B to Declaration of B. Anderson in Support of Ex Parte Application to Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint, #5 Proposed Order for Supplemental Motion to Dismiss the Sherman Antitrust Act Claims in the Second Amended Complaint) (Demas, Tiana) |
|
Filing 106
ORDER SEALING DOC. NO. 99 by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Granting #102 APPLICATION to Seal Document, this Court grants Plaintiffs John Roe 1, Jane Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 3 and John Roe 2 application for an ORDER sealing Document 99 "Second Amended Complaint" pursuant to Local Rule 79-5 on the grounds the incorrect draft of the pleading containing work product privilege was erroneously filed. (es)
|
| Filing 105 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form, #104 , Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form,, #103 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 104 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: APPLICATION to file document Doc No 99 under seal #102 by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. Plaintiff is ordered to lodge a proposed order no later than 10/21/2022. (et) |
| Filing 103 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: APPLICATION to file document Doc No 99 under seal #102 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (et) |
| Filing 102 APPLICATION to file document Doc No 99 under seal filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3.(Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 101 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. correcting Amended Complaint/Petition, #99 Correct Document filed as Docket No. 100 (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 100 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Does, Rick Rankin, The State Bar of California, Tyler Technologies, Inc. amending Amended Complaint, Amended Complaint, Amended Complaint/Petition, #99 , Complaint - (Discovery), Amended Complaint,, filed by plaintiff Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2(Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 99 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against plaintiff Does, Rick Rankin, The State Bar of California, Tyler Technologies, Inc. amending Amended Complaint, Amended Complaint, Complaint - (Discovery), Amended Complaint,, filed by plaintiff Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2(Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 98 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 9-15-2022 re Transcript #97 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ss) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 97 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 9-15-2022. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: BABYKIN COURTHOUSE SERVICES, phone number (626)963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 10/27/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 11/7/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/4/2023. (ss) |
| Filing 96 NOTICE of Change of address by Tiana A. Demas attorney for Defendant The State Bar of California. Changing attorneys address to 10265 Science Center Drive, San Diego, CA 92121. Filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 95 TRANSCRIPT ORDER as to Defendant The State Bar of California for Court Smart (CS). Court will contact Maritza DeJesus at mdejesus@cooley.com with further instructions regarding this order. Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the transcription company. (Demas, Tiana) |
|
Filing 94
Order re Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkts. 35, 36, 38) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: IT IS ORDERED THAT the Sherman Act 2 claim is dismissed with leave to amend, whereas the 3 claim is dismissed without leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiffs are given leave to add additional factual allegations, re-plead the 2 claim, and add a 1 claim. Otherwise, Plaintiffs shall not add new causes of action or parties. Defendants may file a Supplemental Motion to Dismiss within fourteen (14) days addressing the Sherman Act claims. Plaintiffs shall file any Supplemental Opposition within fourteen (14) days. And Defendants shall file any Supplemental Reply within seven (7) days. The Clerk of Court will reach out to set a hearing date. When appropriate, the Court will issue further orders regarding supplemental jurisdiction. Denying #35 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant The State Bar of California; Denying #36 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant The State Bar of California; Denying with leave to amend #38 MOTION to Dismiss. (es)
|
| Filing 93 MINUTES OF Defendant, Tyler Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss #35 Defendant, Rick Rankin's Motion to Dismiss #36 ; Defendant, The State Bar of California's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #38 Plaintiffs' Motion for Order for Protective Order #41 Defendants' Joint Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Requests for Judicial Notice #84 Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Case called and counsel make their appearances. Counsel argue motions. Court takes matters under submission. Court Reporter: CS 09/15/2022. (es) |
|
Filing 92
Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 72) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: For the following reasons, the Motion is DENIED. Denying #72 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. [See Order for details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 91
Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Disqualify (Dkt. 42) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: For the following reasons, the Motion is DENIED. Denying #42 MOTION to disqualify Counsel. [See Order for details.] (es)
|
| Filing 90 REPLY in support of motion NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Lenore Albert, Esq., #2 Declaration Jane Roe 1)(Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 89 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan By Counsel for Plaintiff Only (not joint) ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 88 REPLY in Support of Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Request for Judicial Notice,, #70 , Request for Judicial Notice, #57 #84 filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 87 Notice filed by Defendant Rick Rankin, The State Bar of California, Tyler Technologies, Inc.. re Joint Proposed Case Schedule (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order re Case Schedule)(Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 86 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Opposition to Preliminary Injunction, #2 Exhibit A to the Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Opposition to Preliminary Injunction, #3 Exhibit B to the Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Opposition to Preliminary Injunction, #4 Exhibit C to the Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Opposition to Preliminary Injunction, #5 Exhibit D to the Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Opposition to Preliminary Injunction, #6 Exhibit E to the Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Opposition to Preliminary Injunction, #7 Exhibit F to the Declaration lof T. Demas in Support of Opposition to Preliminary Injunction, #8 Exhibit G to the Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Opposition to Preliminary Injunction, #9 Exhibit H to the Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Opposition to Preliminary Injunction, #10 Exhibit I to the Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Opposition to Preliminary Injunction, #11 Exhibit J to the Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Opposition to Preliminary Injunction)(Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 85 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Request for Judicial Notice,, #70 , Request for Judicial Notice, #57 #84 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 84 Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Request for Judicial Notice,, #70 , Request for Judicial Notice, #57 filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. Motion set for hearing on 9/15/2022 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Their Joint Motion to Strike and Objection to Plaintiffs' Requests for Judicial Notice, #2 Proposed Order) (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 83 DECLARATION of Jane Roe 2 in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 82 NOTICE OF MOTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 Amended filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. Motion set for hearing on 9/15/2022 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 80 NOTICE WITHDRAWING PARA. 1, 3, AND 10 TO THE DECLARATION OF R.S. IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 79 DECLARATION of R.S. in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 78 DECLARATION of Kevan Schwitzer in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 77 DECLARATION of John Roe 2 in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 76 DECLARATION of N.Z. in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 75 DECLARATION of M.A. in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 74 DECLARATION of Lenore Albert, Esq. in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 73 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights #72 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 72 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Continued Violation of the Information Practices Act and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights filed by plaintiff Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. Motion set for hearing on 9/15/2022 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 81 MINUTES OF Telephone Status Conference held before Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Case called and counsel make their appearances. Court and counsel confer. Court moves motions hearings from September 16, 2022 at 2:00pm to Thursday, September 15, 2022, at 11:00am. Court also set a Scheduling conference for 9/15/2022, at 11:00am. Counsel submit proposed dates to Court by September 1, 2022. Court Reporter: CS 8/04/2022. (et) |
| Filing 71 Opposition Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Disqualify Counsel WAGSTAFFE, VON LOEWENFELDT, BUSCH & RADWICK LLP #42 filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Robert G. Retana in Support of The State Bar of California's Opposition to Motion to Disqualify Wagstaffe, von Loewenfeldt, Bush and Readwick LLP as Representatives of the State Bar of California)(Grandt, Suzanne) |
| Filing 70 [PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS] REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. #35 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint #38 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rick Rankin #36 (Supplemental) filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) Modified on 7/29/2022 (es). |
| Filing 69 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rick Rankin #36 filed by Defendant Rick Rankin. (Gold, Michael) |
| Filing 68 REPLY NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint #38 filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 67 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. #35 filed by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.. (Timm, Zachary) |
| Filing 66 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The Court sets a Telephonic Status Conference for 8/4/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The Courtroom Deputy Clerk will circulate call in information via separate email. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (nbo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 65 CONSENT TO PROCEED before United States Magistrate Judge by all parties pursuant to GO 18-11 is approved by District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. This case is hereby reassigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for all further proceedings. Case number will now read 8:22-cv-00983 DFM. (rn) |
| Filing 64 NOTICE OF MOTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Protective Order #41 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. Motion set for hearing on 9/16/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 63 NOTICE OF MOTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Disqualify Counsel WAGSTAFFE, VON LOEWENFELDT, BUSCH & RADWICK LLP #42 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. Motion set for hearing on 9/16/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 62 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by plaintiff Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 61 STATEMENT Joint Case Management Statement filed by Defendant The State Bar of California Joint Case Management Statement re: Order #48 . (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 60 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #59 , Notice (Other) #58 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events Motions and Related Filings Responses/Replies/Other Motion Related Documents - select - Notice of Motion. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 59 Notice Resetting Hearing to Disqualify Defense Counsel filed by plaintiff Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 58 Notice Resetting Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for a Protective Order filed by plaintiff Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 57 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. #35 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint #38 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rick Rankin #36 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 56 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint #38 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 55 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. #35 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 54 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rick Rankin #36 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 53 NOTICE OF MOTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rick Rankin #36 (Re-Notice) filed by Defendant Rick Rankin. Motion set for hearing on 9/16/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (Anderson, Justin) |
| Filing 52 NOTICE OF MOTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. #35 (Re-Notice) filed by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 9/16/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (Timm, Zachary) |
| Filing 51 NOTICE OF MOTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint #38 (Re-Notice) filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. Motion set for hearing on 9/16/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 50 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Suzanne Grandt on behalf of Defendant The State Bar of California (Grandt, Suzanne) |
| Filing 49 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Suzanne Grandt on behalf of Defendant The State Bar of California (Attorney Suzanne Grandt added to party The State Bar of California(pty:dft))(Grandt, Suzanne) |
|
Filing 48
REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: Please refer to Order for complete details., (iva)
|
|
Filing 47
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#22-151) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Sykes, Sunshine Suzanne, this case is transferred from Judge David O. Carter to the calendar of Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:22-cv-00983 SSS(DFMx). (rn)
|
| Filing 46 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Protective Order #41 filed by Defendants Rick Rankin, The State Bar of California, Tyler Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Tiana Demas in Support of Defendants' Joint Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Tiana Demas in Support of Defendants' Joint Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Tiana Demas in Support of Defendants' Joint Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration of Tiana Demas in Support of Defendants' Joint Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order)(Demas, Tiana) |
|
Filing 45
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 8/8/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (kdu)
|
| Filing 44 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Disqualify Counsel #42 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
| Filing 43 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. correcting NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Disqualify Counsel WAGSTAFFE, VON LOEWENFELDT, BUSCH & RADWICK LLP #42 (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 42 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Disqualify Counsel WAGSTAFFE, VON LOEWENFELDT, BUSCH & RADWICK LLP filed by plaintiff Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. Motion set for hearing on 7/25/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 41 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Protective Order filed by plaintiff Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. Motion set for hearing on 7/18/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Roe Plaintiffs, #2 Declaration Lenore Albert) (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 40 NOTICE of Designation of Lead Counsel filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Demas, Tiana) |
| Filing 39 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint #38 filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Anderson, Barrett) |
| Filing 38 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. Motion set for hearing on 8/8/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, #2 Declaration of T. Demas in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit A to T. Demas Declaration in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit B to T. Demas Declaration in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit C to T. Demas Declaration in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, #6 Proposed Order) (Anderson, Barrett) |
| Filing 37 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rick Rankin #36 filed by Defendant Rick Rankin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Anderson, Justin) |
| Filing 36 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rick Rankin filed by Defendant Rick Rankin. Motion set for hearing on 8/8/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Justin A. Anderson in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order) (Anderson, Justin) |
| Filing 35 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. filed by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 8/8/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Timm, Zachary) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Zachary Thomas Timm on behalf of Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. (Attorney Zachary Thomas Timm added to party Tyler Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft))(Timm, Zachary) |
|
Filing 32
ORDER on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice by Judge David O. Carter. APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc., designating Christina N. Goodrich as local counsel. granting #25 Non-Resident Attorney Beth W. Petronio (rolm)
|
|
Filing 33
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge David O. Carter. APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant The State Bar of California, designating Michael G Rhodes as local counsel. granting #18 Non-Resident Attorney Tiana A. Demas (rolm)
|
| Filing 31 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Tiana A. Demas to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant The State Bar of California (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33371088) #30 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. (lt) |
| Filing 30 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Tiana A. Demas to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant The State Bar of California (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33371088) filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael G. Rhodes, #2 Proposed Order) (Rhodes, Michael) |
| Filing 29 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Justin Alexander Anderson counsel for Defendant Rick Rankin. Adding Justin A. Anderson as counsel of record for Defendant Rick Rankin for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Rick Rankin. (Attorney Justin Alexander Anderson added to party Rick Rankin(pty:dft))(Anderson, Justin) |
| Filing 28 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael Allan Gold counsel for Defendant Rick Rankin. Adding Michael A. Gold as counsel of record for Defendant Rick Rankin for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Rick Rankin. (Attorney Michael Allan Gold added to party Rick Rankin(pty:dft))(Gold, Michael) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Tiana A. Demas to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant The State Bar of California (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33328841) #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application and proposed order. Please note DJ and MJ Assignment, dated 5/16/22, Dkt. #6 . Applicants information missing on proposed order. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed for either applicant or local counsel. See Instructions for Applicants (1). (lt) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of Kevan Schwitzer #14 . SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Kevan Schwitzer terminated. (twdb)
|
| Filing 25 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Beth W. Petronio to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33335323) filed by attorney Tyler Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on App of Non-Resident) (Goodrich, Christina) |
| Filing 24 Pro Hac Vice Application of Tiana Demas opposition re: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Tiana A. Demas to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant The State Bar of California (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33328841) #18 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 23 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The State Bar of California answer now due 6/6/2022; Rick Rankin answer now due 6/6/2022; Kevan Schwitzer answer now due 6/6/2022; Tyler Technologies, Inc. answer now due 6/6/2022, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant The State Bar of California.(Waidelich, Walter) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2, upon Defendant Acknowledgment of Service signed by Michael A. Gold, Esq., Attorney and Authorized Agent for Rick Rankin. (Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 21 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Gregory John Merchant counsel for Defendant The State Bar of California. Adding Gregory Merchant as counsel of record for The State Bar of California for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Attorney Gregory John Merchant added to party The State Bar of California(pty:dft))(Merchant, Gregory) |
| Filing 20 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Barrett J Anderson counsel for Defendant The State Bar of California. Adding Barrett J. Anderson as counsel of record for The State Bar of California for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Attorney Barrett J Anderson added to party The State Bar of California(pty:dft))(Anderson, Barrett) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Walter Waidelich counsel for Defendant The State Bar of California. Adding Walter C. Waidelich as counsel of record for The State Bar of California for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Attorney Walter Waidelich added to party The State Bar of California(pty:dft))(Waidelich, Walter) |
| Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Tiana A. Demas to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant The State Bar of California (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33328841) filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rhodes, Michael) |
| Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael G Rhodes counsel for Defendant The State Bar of California. Adding Michael G. Rhodes as counsel of record for The State Bar of California for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant The State Bar of California. (Attorney Michael G Rhodes added to party The State Bar of California(pty:dft))(Rhodes, Michael) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jason Nathaniel Haycock counsel for Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.. Jason N. Haycock is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.. (Haycock, Jason) |
| Filing 15 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. for Beth Petronio (Goodrich, Christina) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Kevan Schwitzer filed by Defendant Kevan Schwitzer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Stipulation)(Belcher, David) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney David Belcher on behalf of Defendant Kevan Schwitzer (Belcher, David) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney David Belcher on behalf of Defendant Kevan Schwitzer (Attorney David Belcher added to party Kevan Schwitzer(pty:dft))(Belcher, David) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christina N Goodrich on behalf of Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. (Attorney Christina N Goodrich added to party Tyler Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft))(Goodrich, Christina) |
| Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (dca) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Beth W Petronio on behalf on Defendant. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2, upon Defendant Employee Doe served on 3/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Leah Wilson, authorized agent as Executive Director of the Stae Bar of Calfiornia in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/28/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2, upon Plaintiff The State Bar of California served on 3/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Leah Wilson, authorized agent as Executive Director of the State Bar of Calfornia in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/28/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, JudyRecords.com, Employee Doe, The State Bar of California. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/18/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 4 through 10, inclusive, Rick Rankin, Kevan Schwitzer, The State Bar of California, Tyler Technologies, Inc. amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by plaintiffs Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/13/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT H)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF AMENDED COMPLAINT amending Complaint - (Discovery the plaintiff having designated a defendant in the complaint by the incorrect name of JudyRecords.com and having discovered the true name of the defendant to be Kevan Schwitzer, filed by plaintiffs filed by plaintiffs Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/24/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT amending Complaint - (Discovery), plaintiff being ignorant of the true name of the defendant and having designated the defendant in the complaint by the fictitious name of DOE 1 and having discovered the true name of the defendant to be Tyler Technologies, Inc., filed by plaintiffs Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/25/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT E)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2, upon Defendant Kevan Schwitzer served on 3/29/2022, answer due 4/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon 6909 State Hwy 161, Apt No 320, Irving, TX 75039 in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/1/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT G) (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2, upon Defendant Rick Rankin acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 4/30/2022, answer due 5/23/2022. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Michael A.Gold, Jeffer Manpels Butler and Mitchell LLP, Attorney for defendant Rick Rankin. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT I) (ghap) Modified on 5/16/2022 (ghap). |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 3, John Roe 2, upon Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. served on 3/28/2022, answer due 4/18/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Capitol Corporate Services-Leigh Johnson-Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/29/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT F) (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Lenore L Albert on behalf of Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, John Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, John Roe 2, Jane Roe 3 (Attorney Lenore L Albert added to party Jane Roe 1(pty:pla), Attorney Lenore L Albert added to party John Roe 1(pty:pla), Attorney Lenore L Albert added to party Jane Roe 2(pty:pla), Attorney Lenore L Albert added to party John Roe 2(pty:pla), Attorney Lenore L Albert added to party Jane Roe 3(pty:pla))(Albert, Lenore) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.'s Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 filed by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc. (Haycock, Jason) |
| Filing 3 Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.'s Certification Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc., (Haycock, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.. (Haycock, Jason) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County, case number 30-2022-0125695-CU-AT-CXC Receipt No: ACACDC-33294587 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I) (Attorney Jason Nathaniel Haycock added to party Tyler Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft))(Haycock, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
