Ellwood et al v. Network Capital Funding Corporation
| William Francis Ellwood and Eitan Barr |
| Network Capital Funding Corporation |
| 8:2022cv01522 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Eitan Barr, William Francis Ellwood, (Kaufman, Rachel) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Eitan Barr, William Francis Ellwood. (Kaufman, Rachel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Eitan Barr, William Francis Ellwood. (Kaufman, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-33809125 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs William Francis Ellwood, Eitan Barr. (Attorney Rachel Kaufman added to party Eitan Barr(pty:pla), Attorney Rachel Kaufman added to party William Francis Ellwood(pty:pla))(Kaufman, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
