Karen Ann Aviss v. United States of America
| Karen Ann Aviss |
| United States of America |
| 8:2022cv02140 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S PETITION AND DISMISSING CASE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: As indicated at the hearing on 1/6/2023, pursuant to the parties' representation that they appear to have reached an agreement on Plaintiff's petition #1 , the Court hereby DENIES the petition without prejudice and DISMISSES this action. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file their finalized agreement within 60 days of this order. The agreement and any subsequent filings related to Plaintiff's petition--including if Plaintiff chooses to refile her claim because the parties do not finalize an agreement--should be filed in the criminal case giving rise to the forfeiture at issue in this matter, Case No. 2:21-cr-00303-SB-1. Upon further consideration in camera (following the January 6th hearing), there is no need to file anything further in this case (including but not limited to the finalized agreement). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (gk)
|
| Filing 10 MINUTES OF Hearing on Petition held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court hears from the parties on Plaintiff's petition #1 and their agreement to resolve the petition, as reflected on the record. The Court indicates its intent to deny the petition without prejudice and to close the civil matter. While the Court indicated that the closure of this case will be subject to reopening for purposes of being advised by the parties about their agreement, the parties should file the finalized agreement in the criminal case giving rise to the forfeiture, Case No. 2:21-cr-00303-SB-1, within 60 days. The Court also indicates its intent to stay the forfeiture in the criminal matter pending the finalization of the parties' agreement. Separate orders, in both this matter and the criminal matter, shall issue. Court Reporter: Katherine Stride. (gk) |
| Filing 9 Letter from Karen A. Aviss to the Court re Real Property located at Silverado, CA. (gk) |
|
Filing 8
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 853, the Court hereby schedules a hearing on the petition filed in this action for January 6, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6C. The Court finds good cause to hold the hearing on that datemore than 30 days from the filing of the petitionin light of the various court holidays in December and early January. The Government is ordered to a file a response to the petition by December 19, 2022, and any reply is due no later than December 29, 2022.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYING A FILING FEE #4 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. On November 28, 2022, Plaintiff Karen Ann Aviss filed an application to proceed in this action, in which she asserts rights to certain property subject to forfeiture, without paying a filing fee. Dkt No. 4. The application makes an adequate showing of indigency. See Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). Thus, the Court grants Plaintiffs application. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rolm)
|
|
Filing 6
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 5 Text Only Entry: This case has been assigned to United States District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The case number on all documents filed with the Court should read 8:22-cv-02140-SB. Please refer to the assigned judge's Procedures and Schedules, available on the Court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov/judges-requirements, for additional information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Karen Ann Aviss. (lh) |
| Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Karen Ann Aviss, served on 11/28/2022. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Karen Ann Aviss, identifying Other Affiliate Dale Leonard Aviss for Karen Ann Aviss. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant United States of America. Filed by Plaintiff Karen Ann Aviss. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Karen Ann Aviss v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Karen Ann Aviss | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
