Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc. v. Cyril USA, LLC et al
| Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc. |
| Cyril USA, LLC, Hookah Partner LLC, Antonio Arboleya, Antonio Arboleya Rodriguez and Antonio Arboleda |
| 8:2023cv01022 |
| June 10, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 as to Defendant Hookah Partner LLC. (twdb) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 as to Defendant Antonio Arboleya. (twdb) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 as to Defendant Cyril USA, LLC. (twdb) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #6 filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #6 filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #6 filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The trademark report should have been e-filed separately and in the correct event category. The Clerk has docketed the report under the correct event. No further action is required unless the Court directs to do so. Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments #1 Civil Cover Sheet, Attachment # 2 Supplement Notice of Interested Parties should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1 Each document should have been filed separately. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
| Filing 5 *DOCKET BY CLERK* REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35472458 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Notice of Interested Parties, #3 Supplement Report on the Filing of Trademark, #4 Supplement Proposed Summons - Cyril USA, LLC, #5 Supplement Proposed Summons - Hookah Partner LLC, #6 Supplement Proposed Summons - Antonio Arboleya) (Attorney Natu J Patel added to party Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.(pty:pla))(Patel, Natu) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
