Toebey Caldwell v. City of Irvine et al
Toebey Caldwell |
City Of Irvine and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
8:2023cv01884 |
October 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Douglas F McCormick |
Fred W Slaughter |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City Of Irvine, (Kraus, Roberta) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant City Of Irvine. (Kraus, Roberta) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2022-01278681 Receipt No: ACACDC-36179197 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant City Of Irvine. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B City of Irvine's Demurrer to Complaint, #3 Exhibit C Notice of Ruling, #4 Exhibit D First Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit E City's Demurrer to First Amended Complaint, #6 Exhibit F Substitution of Attorney, #7 Exhibit G Opposition to City's Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint, #8 Exhibit H City's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to City's Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint, #9 Exhibit I Notice of Ruling on City's Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint, #10 Exhibit J Second Amended Complaint) (Attorney Roberta A Kraus added to party City Of Irvine(pty:dft))(Kraus, Roberta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.