Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Sully-Miller Contracting Company
| Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust, Southern California Partnership for Jobs Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 12 Defined Contribution Trust, Fund For Construction Industry Advancement, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Vacation-Holiday Savigs Trust and Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund |
| Sully-Miller Contracting Company |
| 8:2024cv02418 |
| November 5, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Vacation-Holiday Savigs Trust, Southern California Partnership for Jobs Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Fund For Construction Industry Advancement, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 12 Defined Contribution Trust, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Meg Lawson, Manager, Authorized to accept per CSC - Lawyers Incorporating Service in compliance with statute not specified by personal service (Thompson, Andrew) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel must review Judge Dean D. Pregerson's Procedures and Schedules on court's website. Counsel must review the Court's Standing Order and CV Trial Order, and comply with the same.(SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS AS ENUMERATED HEREIN). (lc) Modified on 12/6/2024 (lc).
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,,, #1 as to Defendant Sully-Miller Contracting Company. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiffs Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Vacation-Holiday Savigs Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 12 Defined Contribution Trust, Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund, Southern California Partnership for Jobs Fund, Fund For Construction Industry Advancement, (Thompson, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,,, #1 filed by plaintiffs Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Vacation-Holiday Savigs Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 12 Defined Contribution Trust, Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund, Southern California Partnership for Jobs Fund, Fund For Construction Industry Advancement. (Thompson, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Vacation-Holiday Savigs Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 12 Defined Contribution Trust, Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund, Southern California Partnership for Jobs Fund, Fund For Construction Industry Advancement. (Thompson, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38532644 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiffs Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Vacation-Holiday Savigs Trust, Southern California Partnership for Jobs Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Fund For Construction Industry Advancement, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 12 Defined Contribution Trust. (Attorney Andrew Quinn Thompson added to party Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust(pty:pla), Attorney Andrew Quinn Thompson added to party Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund(pty:pla), Attorney Andrew Quinn Thompson added to party Trustees of the Operating Engineers Vacation-Holiday Savigs Trust(pty:pla), Attorney Andrew Quinn Thompson added to party Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust(pty:pla), Attorney Andrew Quinn Thompson added to party Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 12 Defined Contribution Trust(pty:pla), Attorney Andrew Quinn Thompson added to party Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund(pty:pla), Attorney Andrew Quinn Thompson added to party Southern California Partnership for Jobs Fund(pty:pla), Attorney Andrew Quinn Thompson added to party Fund For Construction Industry Advancement(pty:pla))(Thompson, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
