Paria Baba Ahmadi et al v. Marco Rubio et al
| PARIA BABA AHMADI and ARASH EBRAHIMI |
| Marco Rubio and ROBERT JACHIM |
| 8:2025cv00129 |
| January 23, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFFS All Plaintiffs, (Morrison, Curtis) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by PLAINTIFFS PARIA BABA AHMADI, ARASH EBRAHIMI. (Morrison, Curtis) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs PARIA BABA AHMADI, ARASH EBRAHIMI. (Morrison, Curtis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38967011 - Fee: $405, filed by PLAINTIFFS PARIA BABA AHMADI, ARASH EBRAHIMI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A April 7, 2024 Declaration of Carson Wu, #2 Exhibit B1 9 FAM 504.11 (U) IMMIGRANT VISA REFUSALS, #3 Exhibit B2 9 FAM 504.11 (U) IMMIGRANT VISA REFUSALS, #4 Exhibit C AHMADI CEAC, #5 Exhibit D Congressional Inquiry, #6 Exhibit E Senatorial Inquiry and Response) (Attorney Curtis Lee Morrison added to party PARIA BABA AHMADI(pty:pla), Attorney Curtis Lee Morrison added to party ARASH EBRAHIMI(pty:pla))(Morrison, Curtis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
