Hamilton v. Lockyer
Plaintiff: George Hamilton
Defendant: Bill Lockyer
Case Number: 1:2004cv05929
Filed: July 6, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Neil V. Wake
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER, signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 1/6/2009. IT IS ORDERED that the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. # 35 ) is dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with Rules 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Scrivner, E)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamilton v. Lockyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Lockyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?