Shue v. McGrath
Case Number: 1:2005cv00504
Filed: April 15, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
Presiding Judge: Theresa A. Goldner
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 CJA 20 APPOINTMENT ORDER signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/12/2010. Attorney Katherine Louise Hart added for Petitioner, Jerry Wayne Shue, Jr. (Lundstrom, T)
April 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER DECLINING Issuance of CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY re Notice of Appeal 51 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/6/09. (Hellings, J)
February 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER ADOPTING in FULL the FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 43 and DENYING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/6/09: Petition is DENIED with prejudice; and The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgmnent. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
April 25, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Judge Theresa A. Goldner on 04/22/05. (Hinman, W)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shue v. McGrath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?