Ruff v. Zumwalt, et al
| 1:2005cv00631 |
| May 10, 2005 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
304
ORDER Re; Plaintiff's Motion For Vacatur Of Stay Pending Appeal And For Release Of Cash Bond, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/27/2010. Plaintiff is now entitled to the release of $410,483.65 of the cash amount deposited with this Court. (Scrivner, E)
|
|
Filing
293
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 280 Motion to Increase Supersedeas Bond signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 06/23/2010. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
283
ORDER Re: Plaintiff's Motion For Attorney's Fees and Bills of Costs signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/27/2010. (Esteves, C)
|
|
Filing
243
ORDER Re: Plaintiff's Request That Motion For Reconsideration And Clarification 238 Be Heard On Shortened Time, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/23/2009. Motion for Reconsideration (previously set for 12/28/2009) will be heard 12/30/2009 at 10:00AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Wanger. Defendant's opposition to be filed by 12/28/2009. No reply brief to be filed.(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
237
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER Granting Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Stay of Enforcement of Judgment Pending Post Trial Motions and Appeal, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/18/2009. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
236
MEMORANDUM, DECISION and ORDER DENYING Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion For Declaratory And Ancillary Relief Under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 199 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/18/2009. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
235
ORDER RE: Plaintiff's Motion for Prejudgment interest, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/11/2009. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
229
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Lodge Proposed Order RE Prejudgment Interest on Compliance with Memorandum Decision filed November 30, 2009, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/3/2009. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
226
MEMORANDUM, DECISION GRANTING In Part and DENYING In Part Plaintiff's Motion for Prejudgment Interest 206 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 11/30/2009. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
198
JUDGMENT under FRCivP 54(b) dated *09/24/2009* in favor of Plaintiff Daniel E. Ruff against Defendants Sandy Roper and William Zumwalt and in favor of Defendants County of Kings and Mark Sherman against Plaintiff Daniel E. Ruff. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER RE: CONTINUED DEPOSITION OF JOHN BETTENCOURT, CPA signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 09/14/09. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER on Defendants' 127 MOTIONS IN LIMINE signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/13/2009. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/23/2009 on 112 MOTION IN LIMINE Motion to Preclude Defendants' Witnesses and Evidence Not Disclosed During Discovery filed by Daniel Eugene Ruff. (Jury Trial set for 9/15/2009 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger and Pretrial Conference set for 8/3/2009 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger). (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ruff v. Zumwalt, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
