Gornick v. California Department of Corrections, et al.
Case Number: 1:2006cv00296
Filed: March 30, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Presiding Judge: Dennis L. Beck
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 170 JUDGMENT signed by Chief Judge B. Lynn Winmill on 04/16/2012. (Flores, E)
February 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 158 ORDER, signed by Chief Judge B. Lynn Winmill on 2/3/12: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration for Appointment of Counsel 132 is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion for Court-Appointed Investigator 133 is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion for R econsideration for Full Disclosure 136 is GRANTED IN PART; Plaintiff's Motion for Status 153 is GRANTED as to new pretrial and trial schedule; Plaintiff's Request for Court Order 152 is GRANTED; The pretrial deadlines and trial date s et in the Court's Order of November 29, 2011 131 are VACATED; Disclosure of Witnesses ddl 4/30/12; Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 5/22/12 at 3:00 p.m.; Pretrial Motions and Objections to Exhibits ddls 5/4/12, Responses 5/18/12; Request to Transport Prisoner Witnesses ddl 5/4/12; Trial set for 6/11/12 at 9:00 a.m., Courtroom #7, Fresno, CA; Exhibit Lists, Exhibits, Proposed Voir Dire, Proposed Jury Instructions, Trial Briefs ddl 5/4/12.(Hellings, J)
November 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER Granting 123 Motion for Decision on in Camara Discovery and Trial Date; ORDER Denying 124 Motion to Appoint Counsel; ORDER Denying 130 Motion for New Status Conference; SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief Judge B. Lynn Winmill on 11/28/2011. Pretrial Motions and Objections to Exhibits due by 2/3/2012; Responses due by 02/17/2012; Trial Briefs due by 1/20/2012; Pretrial Conference set for 2/21/2012 at 11:00 AM before Chief Judge B. Lynn Winmill; Jury Trial set for 3/12/2012 at 09:00 AM before Chief Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (Flores, E)
September 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER signed by Chief Judge B. Lynn Winmill on 9/23/2011 setting Settlement Conference for 9/29/2011 at 10:00 AM at Pelican Bay State Prison before Magistrate Judge Nandor J Vadas. (Lundstrom, T)
February 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Larry M. Boyle on 2/7/2011. (Lundstrom, T)
February 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM, DECISION and ORDER and REPORT and RECOMMENDATION signed by Magistrate Judge Larry M. Boyle on 2/24/2010 denying as moot 48 Motion for Court to conduct in Camera Review of Discovery; denying as moot 58 Motion to serve Defendants and recommending that 47 MOTION to DISMISS filed by Brandon, K. A. Dicks, J. Payne, - Scribner be GRANTED. ( Objections to F&R due by 3/10/2010). (Lundstrom, T)
September 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER DENYING 41 45 49 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 44 Motion for 45 Day Extension of Time ; ORDER STRIKING 40 Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents signed by Magistrate Judge Larry M. Boyle on 9/21/2009. ( Filing Deadline: 11/6/2009)(Figueroa, O)
March 30, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 6 FIRST INFORMATIONAL ORDER signed by Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/30/06. (Keeler, P)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gornick v. California Department of Corrections, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?