Ward v. Voss et al
1:2006cv00311 |
March 22, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Anthony W. Ishii |
Sandra M. Snyder |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/16/10: Recommending that Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants be granted; and That the Clerk of Court be directed to close the case; MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGM ENT 27 filed by Gary Renzaglia, Ryan Argulio, Kim Wyatt, Patrick Daley, Barbara Devine, James Walter, Brian Bowely, Rocky Spurgeon, Jim Robinson, September Winchell, Tom Voss and Complaint 1 filed by Ronald Ward referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 10/21/2010. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 36 ORDER STRIKING 35 Plaintiff's Answer to Defendants' Reply on Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/3/2010. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 26 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF to SHOW CAUSE Why Doe Defendants Should Not Be Dismissed From This Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 3/1/2010. Show Cause Response due by 4/5/2010. (Jessen, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ward v. Voss et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.