Martinez v. Scribner
| 1:2006cv00656 |
| May 30, 2006 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING 34 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal and DIRECTING Clerk to Serve the Court of Appeals signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 7/24/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS and Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 04/16/2009. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER DENYING 22 MOTION for EXTENSION filed by Felix Cruz Martinez, signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 02/03/2009. (Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S 19 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TOFILE OBJECTIONS TO 18 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 1/8/2009. (Objections to F&R due by 1/26/2009) (Figueroa, O)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez v. Scribner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
