Gonzales v. California Department of Mental Health et al
| Rick Gonzales |
| Concepcion Macias, Michael Walker, Laticia Martinez, Gary Renzaglia, Rocky Spurgeon, James Robinson, California Department of Mental Health, Coalinga State Hospital, W. T. Voss, Chuck Rabaut, Sharon Rogers, Margarita Quintero, Rachelle Barb and Barbara Devine |
| 1:2007cv00427 |
| March 19, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
JUDGMENT dated *4/3/2013* pursuant to order, signed by Chief Judge B. Lynn Winmill on 4/3/2013. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
43
REPORT and RECOMMENDATION, signed by Magistrate Judge Larry M. Boyle on 7/22/10: Recommending that Plaintiff DeBerry's Motion for Summary Judgment 30 be DENIED without prejudice; Plaintiff Carmony's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Re lief 48 be DENIED without prejudice, and instead be addressed in the Triage Conference; The actions filed by Raymond Amadeo, Don D. McNeal and Fred Scott be DISMISSED without prejudice; In the event Plaintiff Rick Gonzales fails to file an Amended Complaint by August 20, 2010, his original Complaint should be STAYED pending further notice. Objections to R&R due by 8/12/2010. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
