Shelton v. Chorley
Plaintiff: Adam Shelton
Defendant: Glen Chorley
Case Number: 1:2007cv00560
Filed: April 11, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Presiding Judge: Sandra M. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 46 Motion for Summary Judgment ; ORDER DENYING Defendant's 57 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Reply; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff Adam Shelton Jr.'s 50 Motion to Ask this Court to Deny Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Enter Judgment signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 3/31/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
June 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Request to Get My Legal Documents Out of My Property 42 ; ORDER DENYING Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Appointment of Counsel 44 , signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 6/1/10. (Hellings, J)
May 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 47 Motion to Vacate Deadline for Joint Proposed Pretrial Order signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 5/26/2010. (Sant Agata, S)
March 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER DENYING 41 Motion to Appoint Counsel; ORDER GRANTING 41 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Request for Production of Documents and GRANTING Plaintiff until March 31, 2010 to Produce Requested Documents signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 3/5/2010. (Sant Agata, S)
February 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 2/18/2010. It is ORDERED granting Defendant's request and extending the deadline to allow Defendants to depose Plaintiff by March 29, 2010, and to complete a dispositive motion by April 29, 2010. (Doc. # 38 )(Case Management Deadline: 3/29/2010, Dispositive Motions filed by 4/29/2010) (Scrivner, E)
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER DENYING 21 Motion for Judgment signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 09/26/2009. (Martin, S)
July 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 31 Motion to Vacate the Dispositive Motion Deadline signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 7/16/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
February 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 2/4/2009. Plaintiff shall have 18 days, plus 3 days for mailing or electronic service, from thedate of this Order in which to file a response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Filing due by 2/25/2009. (Sondheim, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shelton v. Chorley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam Shelton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glen Chorley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?