Stocker v. Warden, et al.
| Johnie L. Stocker |
| Warden, Healthcare Manager, A. Alomari, Anthony Hedgpeth, Sharon Zamora, N. Grannis, David Smith, Jonathan Akanno and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 1:2007cv00589 |
| April 17, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER of DISMISSAL Pursuant to Stipulation signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/23/11: The Clerk is directed to close the action. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT, Signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/16/2011. Pursuant to this Courts Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than April 15, 2011, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety. (Arellano, S.)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Regarding Telephonic Status Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/5/2011. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER DISCHARGING Order to Show Cause; ORDER Setting Telephonic Status Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/20/2010. (Settlement Conference set for 1/19/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck.)(Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/5/2010. The parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any they have, why they have failed to file dispositional documents or why this action should not be dismissed. The parties may comply with this order by filing a signed stipulation and proposed order regarding dismissal of this action. Show Cause Response due by 10/22/2010. (Bradley, A)
|
|
Filing
62
STIPULATION and ORDER to Amend Schedule - The Early Settlement Conference is continued from 9/17/2009 to 11/12/2009 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck; Expert Disclosure is continued to 1/15/2010, Expert Discovery Cut-off is continued to 2/12/2010. All other scheduled dates will remain unchanged. signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/16/2009. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
53
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/13/2009, Regarding Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication Motion referred to Judge O'Neill. (Objections to F&R due by 5/18/2009) (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL With Prejudice as to Plaintiff's Claims Under California Government Code Section 845.6, Signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/19/2009. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the Stipulation for Dismissal wit h Prejudice as to Plaintiff's Claims Under California Government Code Section 845.6 and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) (ii), Plaintiff's claim in the above-captioned action under California Government Code section 845.6 only be and is hereby dismissed. (Arellano, S.)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER on Stipulatios to Dismiss with prejudice Defendant's Anthony Hedgpeth; Alice Alomari and Nola Grannis, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/6/2009. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER DENYING 33 Motion for Leave to Amend the Scheduling Order for the Purpose of Propounding Limited Discovery to Ascertain Identities of Additional Defendants, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/13/2009. (Sondheim, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
