Pulliam v. Lozano et al
Joseph R. Pulliam |
M. Lozano, L. Mason and W. Gomez |
1:2007cv00964 |
July 5, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kern |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
William M. Wunderlich |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 139 ORDER discharging 121 Order & Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum as to Plaintiff, Joseph R. Pulliam signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/11/2013. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 134 ORDER requiring production of Plaintiff for Trial on 12/11/2013 at 8:00 a.m. signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/10/2013. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 132 ORDER Granting Defendants' 125 Motion to Substitute Expert Witness for Trial signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/05/2013. (Flores, E) |
Filing 124 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Withdraw Consent And Acknowleding Plaintiff's Objections To The Court's Pretrial Order (ECF No. 115 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/26/2013. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 122 ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Transport Witness, Calvin Ambers for Trial on December 10, 2013 at 8:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 6 signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/21/2013. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 113 ORDER Partially Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Witnesses 104 and Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Add a Defendant 106 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/30/13. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 108 ORDER Denying Motion For Appointmnet Of Counsel (ECF No. 105 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/24/2013. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 102 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/19/2013 correcting erratum 101 Amended Second Scheduling Order. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 101 AMENDED SECOND SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/31/2013. Telephonic Pretrial Conference: October 18, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 6 (MJS); Jury Trial set for 12/10/2013 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 94 ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/25/2013 adopting 91 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 62 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 91 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS for Denial of Defendants' 62 Motion for Summary Judgment; Fourteen-Day Objection Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/29/2012. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 12/17/2012. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 88 ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (ECF No. 87 ), Twenty-One Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/17/2012. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 83 AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - NOTICE and WARNING of Requirements For Opposing Defendants' 62 Summary Judgment Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/30/2012. Response to Motion for Summary Judgment Due Within Twenty-One Days. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 75 ORDER DENYING Miscellaneous Motions re 70 & 72 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/27/2012. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 74 ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment within Twenty-One Days signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 01/21/2012. Opposition or Statement on Non-Opposition due by 2/16/2012. (Flores, E) |
Filing 71 ORDER Directing Service Of Subpoena Duces Tecum By United States Marshal Without Prepayment Of Cost (ECF No. 68 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/11/2011. (Service of Subpoena Duces Tecum Deadline: 11/7/2011) (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 68 ORDER Granting In Part And Denying In Part Plaintiff's Motion For A Subpoena Duces Tecum And Denying Plaintiff's Two Motions To Enlarge Discovery (ECF Nos. 55 , 56 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/12/2011.(Subpoena to be Issued: 9/29/2011) (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 50 ORDER denying 48 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/12/2011. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 49 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 40 MOTION to COMPEL Production of Documents Without Prejudice; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Leave to File Motion For Subpoena Duces Tecum; Plaintiff's Motion Due Within Twenty-One Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/9/2011. (Motions filed by 4/4/2011.) (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 46 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 40 ; DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Postpone 42 ; and GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Defendants' Motion to Compel and REQUEST for Extension of Discovery Deadlines 41 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/31/11: Discovery Deadline RESET to March 31, 2011; Pre-Trial Motion Deadline RESET to June 30, 2011. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 37 ORDER DENYING 36 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Reply Pleading signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/8/2010. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff a Thirty-Day Extension of Time in Which to File an Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich on 1/12/2009. Amended Complaint due by 2/18/2009. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 20 ORDER DENYING 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich on 1/5/2009. (Martin, S) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SUBMIT NEW APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND CERTIFIED COPY OF TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT or PAY FILING FEE signed by Judge William M. Wunderlich on 07/06/2007. IFP application or filing fee due by 8/9/2007. (Attachments: # 1 IFP app form# 2 IFP app instructions)(Esteves, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.