Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. PACCAR Financial Corp. et al
| Wells Fargo Bank, National Association |
| PACCAR Financial Corp. and Sidhu Truck Line, Inc. |
| 1:2008cv00904 |
| June 26, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Sacramento |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1335 Interpleader Action |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to Enter Interpleader Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff Wells Fargo and Judgment in Favor of Defendant Paccar and to Distribute Interpleader Funds, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/5/09. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER MODIFYING January 28, 2009 Order Regarding Plaintiff Wells Fargo's Motion for Judgment in Interpleader and Award of Attorneys' Fees and Entry of Default Judgment, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/2/09. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Weills Fargo's Motion for Judgment in Interpleader and Award of Attorneys' Fees and Entry of Default Judgment as to Sidhu Truck 22 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/27/09. (cc via email: Fresno & Sacramento Financial Clerk)(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER requiring plaintiff to submit evidence signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/13/09. (Nazaroff, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
