Kendrick v. Pina et al
Plaintiff: Owen Thomas Kendrick
Defendant: D. Pina, S. Reig, Anderson, Blackford, Mobely, Sandoval and G. Simon
Case Number: 1:2008cv01055
Filed: July 23, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Dennis L. Beck
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER, signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 2/25/2014. CASE CLOSED. It is ORDERED Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 73 ). This action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk Shall enter judgment accordingly. The Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability because reasonable jurists would not debate the Court's ruling on this matter. (Fahrney, E)
October 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 10/8/2013. Defendant's Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (Doc. 79 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Waiver of Required Copies to the Court (Doc. 77 ) is GRANTED In Part and DENIED In Part; Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 78 ) is STRICKEN. (Marrujo, C)
June 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER that Plaintiff must File a Response to Defendants' 73 Motion to Dismiss no Later than June 18, 2013, signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 06/04/2013. (Flores, E)
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER, signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 5/13/2013. It is ORDERED Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) (Doc. 68 ).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the Courts order dismissing this action (Doc. 63 ), and vacating the judgment entered August 30, 2012 (Doc. 64). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiffs Motion (Doc. 54) requesting an order on Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 56). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting the following motions: Plaintiffs Motion to Extend Court Deadlines (Doc. 57), and Defendants Motions to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (Docs. 61 and 62). The new discovery cut-off date shall be August 5, 2013. The new dispositive motion deadline shall be September 30, 2013. (Fahrney, E)
December 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 12/19/2012 re 65 Motion. (Lundstrom, T)
August 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER DISMISSING CASE, without Prejudice, signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 08/30/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
May 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER, signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 5/17/2012. It is ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall seal Defendants' Request to File a Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel in Excess of Time. (Doc. 58 )(Fahrney, E)
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 AMENDED ORDER DENYING Plaintiffs 49 Motion for Subpoenas, 50 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 51 Request for Clerk to Stamp Subpoena for Plaintiff Appearing in Pro Per, and 52 Motion for the Courts to Notify Defendants Their 12(b) Motion Deadline Has Passed, signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 03/07/2012. (Flores, E)
February 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER, signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 2/27/2012, DENYING Plaintiffs 49 Motion for Subpoenas, 50 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 51 Request for Clerk to Stamp Subpoena for Plaintiff Appearing in Pro Per, and 52 Motion for the Courts to Notify Defendants Their 12(b) Motion Deadline Has Passed. (Marrujo, C)
November 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 41 Application for Default Judgment signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 11/29/2011. (Flores, E)
August 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 8/25/2011. (Lundstrom, T)
August 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 8/5/2011. Show Cause Response due by 8/18/2011.(Lundstrom, T)
December 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER that Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss on or before January 21, 2011; ORDER that Plaintiff shall follow all procedures necessary to place him on Preferred Library User status; ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Order to the Warden and Librarian for where Plaintiff is currently confined, signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 12/22/2010. ( Filing Deadline: 1/21/2011.) (Marrujo, C)
November 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER DENYING IN PART 27 Plaintiff's Motion for Court Order re Legal Documents; ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to File a Response to 26 and 27 Plaintiff's Motions on or before December 7, 2010; ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to Serve a Copy of 22 Motion to Dismiss on Plaintiff no later than November 24, 2010; and ORDER GRANTING 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time, signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 11/17/2010. (Jessen, A)
June 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to File a Response to 22 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss no Later Than Friday, July 2, 2010, signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 6/14/2010. (Jessen, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kendrick v. Pina et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Owen Thomas Kendrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Pina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Reig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blackford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mobely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sandoval
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?