Alvarado et al v. Nederend et al
Octavio Alvarado, Pablo Martinez, Omar Gomez, Jose de Jesus Garcia and Daniel Gomez |
Rex Nederend and Sheri Nederend |
1:2008cv01099 |
July 30, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Labor: Other Office |
Tulare |
Sandra M. Snyder |
Oliver W. Wanger |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
29:1801 Farmworker Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 ORDER and JUDGMENT signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/2/2011. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 73 MEMORANDUM DECISION Re Unopposed Motion For Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 59 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/17/2011. ((1) The Settlement Class is CERTIFIED; (2) The Class Settlement is APPROVED; (3) The payment of $165,5 23 in attorneys fees and $10,827.70 in costs is APPROVED; (4) They payment of a $7,500 enhancement to the named Plaintiffs Octavio Alvarado, Pablo Martinez, Omar Gomez,Daniel Gomez, and Jose de Jesus Garcia is APPROVED; (5) The payment of $15,000 to the SettlementAdministrator is APPROVED. Plaintiffs shall submit a form of order consistent with this decision within five (5) days following electronic service. )(Gaumnitz, R) |
Filing 55 STIPULATION and ORDER to continue deadlines and hearing for Final Approval of Class Settlement; Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 4/8/2011 is moved to 6/2/2011 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger, Motion Hearing currently set for 4/8/2011 is moved to 5/2/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 2/25/2011. (Kusamura, W) |
Filing 53 ORDER (1) Conditionally Certifying Settlement Class; (2) Preliminary Approving Class Settlement; (3) Appointing Class Representatives and Class Counsel; (4) Approving Class Notice ans Related Materials; (5) Appointing Settlement Administrator; and (6) Scheduling Final Approval Hearing, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 1/26/2011. (Gaumnitz, R) |
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM DECISION RE Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, document 40 ; FINAL APPROVAL HEARING set for 4/4/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger; order signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 1/11/2011. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 36 FOURTH STIPULATION AND ORDER To Continue The Scheduling Conference, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 726/2010. ( Parties are hereby allowed to extend all deadlines for 60 days, in accordance with Local Rule 143 (Fed. R. Civ. P. 83). Defendants Response to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint is due on September 16, 2010. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2010 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger.) (Gaumnitz, R) |
Filing 34 THIRD STIPULATION and ORDER To Stay Action Pending Mediation, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/13/2010. (Action stayed for purpose of mediation. Time for Defendants to file Answer to the January 19, 2010, Amended Complaint is extended to 7/16/2010, Scheduling Conference set 5/20/2010 is VACATED.) (Gaumnitz, R) |
Filing 25 ORDER to STAY Action Pending Mediation Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties, Signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/1/2009. Case stayed for 120 days for purposes of completing mediation. (Arellano, S.) |
Filing 19 Stipulation on Interim Extension of Time to File Complaint signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/27/2009. ( Amended Complaint due by 5/21/2009) (Figueroa, O) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.