Fernandez v. Vazquez
Petitioner: Angelo Joseph Fernandez
Respondent: P. L. Vazquez
Case Number: 1:2008cv01178
Filed: August 12, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Gary S. Austin
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING 11 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION; ORDER Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Directing Clerk of Court to Enter Judgment; ORDER DECLINING Issuance of Certificate of Appealability, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/22/2009. CASE CLOSED. (Sondheim, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fernandez v. Vazquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Angelo Joseph Fernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: P. L. Vazquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?