United States of America v. North Kern Machinery, Inc et al
| United States of America |
| North Kern Machinery, Inc, North Kern Machinery Company, South Kern Machinery Company, South Kern Machinery, Inc. and Kern Machinery, Inc. |
| 1:2009cv01136 |
| June 30, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Sacramento |
| Theresa A. Goldner |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER TO DISMISS AND CLOSE ACTION signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/28/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER after Settlement, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/29/2010. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER Modifying Case Schedule, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/14/2010. Non-Expert Discovery due by 8/20/2010. Expert Disclosure due by 9/10/2010. Supplemental Expert Disclosure due by 10 /1/2010. Expert Discovery due by 11/5/2010. Dispositive Motions filed by 11/5/2010. Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 11/5/2010. Pretrial Conference RESET for 12/13/2010 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial RESET for 1/24/2011 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill . (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
