Medeiros v. Merced County Sheriff Deputy Clark et al
| Theodore Furtado Medeiros |
| Scott Clark, Eric Macias, Mark N. Pazin, Merced County Sheriff Department and County of Merced |
| 1:2009cv01177 |
| July 2, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Merced |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
STIPULATION and ORDER for Dismissal with Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/30/13. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER GRANTING Motion for Summary Judgment in part and DENYING in part, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/17/2011. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM, DECISION RE: 56 Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/1/2011. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
55
Courtroom Decorum. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM, DECISION and ORDER; granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/5/2010. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER Motion Hearing currently set for 10/26/2009 has been moved 11/30/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 10/22/2009. (Kusamura, W)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
