Lynch v. Doe, et al
Plaintiff: Anthoney Lynch
Defendant: John or Jane Doe, John Doe, Unknown Construction Company and Unknown "Municipality"
Case Number: 1:2009cv02097
Filed: December 2, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Presiding Judge: Gary S. Austin
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER TREATING the 78 Magistrate Judge's September 26, 2019, ORDER as Findings and Recommendations and ADOPTING those Findings and Recommendations 75 and 76 , ; ORDER DENYING 79 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/10/2020. (CASE REMAINS CLOSED) (Martin-Gill, S)
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER DENYING Motions to Vacate and Appoint Counsel re 75 , 76 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 9/25/19. (Gonzalez, R)
March 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER DENYING Request for an Extension of Time to File an Appeal, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/2/17. (Marrujo, C)
January 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER DENYING Motion to Reopen Time to File Appeal as Untimely 60 ; ORDER DENYING Motion to Excuse Untimely Filing 69 ; Clerk of Court to Serve a Copy of This Order on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/27/17. (Hellings, J)
January 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER: (1) VACATING 66 Order Denying Motion to Reopen Time to File Appeal (2) DIRECTING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Within Fourteen Days Why Motion to Reopen Time to File Appeal Should Not be Denied as Untimely; Clerk of Court to Serve a Copy of This Order on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/31/16. (Marrujo, C)
December 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER DENYING 60 Motion to Reopen Time to File Appeal; Clerk of Court to Serve a Copy of this Order on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/13/2016. (Served on Ninth Circuit electronicly)(Martin-Gill, S)
November 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Motion to Reopen Time to File Appeal Should not be Denied as Untimely, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/7/16. 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
February 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 40 ; ORDER DISMISSING Action, With Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted Under Section 1983; ORDER That Dismissal is Subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G); ORDER for Clerk to Close Case, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/27/15. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
March 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to Submit Declaration In Support of 53 Seventh Motion for Extension of Time, as Instructed by This Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/17/2014. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, Recommending That This Case be Dismissed, With Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted re 38 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/22/13. Referred to Judge Ishii. Objections, If Any, Due in Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
October 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER Vacating FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Of October 11, 2012 (Doc. 37 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/17/2012. (Fahrney, E)
October 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, Recommending that this Action be Dismissed, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/11/12. Referred to Judge Ishii; 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
June 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Vacating Findings and Recommendations 29 ; ORDER Granting Extension of Time to File Second Amended Complaint 30 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/25/12. Thirty Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
June 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that this 22 Action be Dismissed, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief may be Granted; Objections, if any, Due in Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/13/2012. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 7/17/2012. (Sant Agata, S)
December 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/8/2011 denying 23 request to add information piecemeal to first amended complaint; requiring Plaintiff to either file Second Amended Complaint or notify court that he does not wish to amend. (Amended Complaint due by 1/11/2012). (Lundstrom, T)
July 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER DENYING 11 Motion for Service as Premature signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/19/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
June 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING 14 Motion to Extend Time to File Amended Complaint; Sixty-Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/9/2011. Amended Complaint due by 8/11/2011 (Sant Agata, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lynch v. Doe, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthoney Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John or Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Construction Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown "Municipality"
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?