Lamon v. Cate et al
Barry Louis Lamon |
Matthew L. Cate, D. G. Adams, K. Daveiga, G. A. Finley, A. Baer, T. Carter, Miles, C. D. Thompson, S. Folks and J. Brightwell |
1:2009cv02220 |
December 22, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Oliver W. Wanger |
Sandra M. Snyder |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER DENYING Pending Motions as MOOT and DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to CLOSE this CASE Pursuant to Plaintiff's 28 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/29/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 24 ORDER DENYING 22 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/14/2011. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 23 ORDER GRANTING 21 Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint in Excess of Twenty-Five Pages, NUNC PRO TUNC to April 14, 2011, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/13/11. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 19 ORDER Granting First 18 Motion to Extend Time to File a Response to the Court's Screening Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/4/11. (30-Day Deadline). (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 15 ORDER Denying Motion For Reconsideration (Doc. 13 ), signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 11/24/2010. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 12 ORDER DENYING 11 Motion for Appointment of Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/7/2010. (Bradley, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.