Holt v. California Department of Corrections Medical Department et al
| Junior Holt |
| California Department of Corrections Medical Department, P. A. Peters, Fergussen and P. A. Byers |
| 1:2010cv00496 |
| March 19, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/14/2011. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/11/11. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why this Action should not be Dismissed; Show Cause Response Due within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/10/2011. Show Cause Response due by 2/14/2011.(Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS: Plaintiff's claims against the California Department of Corrections Medical Department are DISMISSED. Defendant California Department of Corrections Medical Department terminated. Action shall proceed on plaintiff's eighth amendment claims against defendants Peters, Ferguson and Byers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/10/2010. (Vasquez, J)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER DENYING 13 Motion for Appointment of Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/9/2010. (Bradley, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
