Funtanilla v. Tristan et al
| Gregorio C. Funtanilla, Jr. |
| David Tristan, George Galaza, Fred - Brown, J. Yates, D. Means, Gelinda Vella, J. Marshall, V. Yamamoto, J. Bloxom and J.S. Godin |
| 1:2010cv01048 |
| June 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, With Prejudice, For Failure To State A Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted Under Section 1983 (Docs. 7 and 9 ), ORDER Counting Dismissal As A Strike Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(G), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/15/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Strike)(Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Rule 60(A) Motion for Reconsideration IN PART 5 and STRIKING Footnote 2 From Court Document 4 , But DENYING Request for Relief From Order Denying IFP Status, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/13/10: Plaintiff has fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order to pay the filing fee in full or this action will be dismissed. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Denying 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis pursuant to 28 USC 1915(G), and Requiring Plaintiff to Submit $350.00 Filing Fee within Thirty Days, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/16/2010. Filing Fee Deadline: 7/19/2010. (Verduzco, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
